Skip to main content
Removed numbering, as it's no longer a list
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

Additive Chernoff

Suppose $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ are i.i.d. random variables, taking values in $\{0,1\}$. Let $p=\mathrm{E}\left[X_i\right]$ and $\varepsilon>0$.

\begin{gather*} \operatorname{Pr}\left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \geq p+\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p+\varepsilon}\right)^{p+\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p+\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n } \\ \operatorname{Pr} \left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \leq p-\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p-\varepsilon}\right)^{p-\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p-\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n} \end{gather*}

where $$ D(x \mathbin\| y)=x \ln \frac{x}{y}+(1-x) \ln \left(\frac{1-x}{1-y}\right). $$

  1. For sums of i.i.d random variables, is there any bound tighter than the additive Chernoff?

For sums of i.i.d random variables, is there any bound tighter than the additive Chernoff?

Additive Chernoff

Suppose $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ are i.i.d. random variables, taking values in $\{0,1\}$. Let $p=\mathrm{E}\left[X_i\right]$ and $\varepsilon>0$.

\begin{gather*} \operatorname{Pr}\left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \geq p+\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p+\varepsilon}\right)^{p+\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p+\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n } \\ \operatorname{Pr} \left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \leq p-\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p-\varepsilon}\right)^{p-\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p-\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n} \end{gather*}

where $$ D(x \mathbin\| y)=x \ln \frac{x}{y}+(1-x) \ln \left(\frac{1-x}{1-y}\right). $$

  1. For sums of i.i.d random variables, is there any bound tighter than the additive Chernoff?

Additive Chernoff

Suppose $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ are i.i.d. random variables, taking values in $\{0,1\}$. Let $p=\mathrm{E}\left[X_i\right]$ and $\varepsilon>0$.

\begin{gather*} \operatorname{Pr}\left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \geq p+\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p+\varepsilon}\right)^{p+\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p+\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n } \\ \operatorname{Pr} \left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \leq p-\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p-\varepsilon}\right)^{p-\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p-\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n} \end{gather*}

where $$ D(x \mathbin\| y)=x \ln \frac{x}{y}+(1-x) \ln \left(\frac{1-x}{1-y}\right). $$

For sums of i.i.d random variables, is there any bound tighter than the additive Chernoff?

deleted 268 characters in body
Source Link
Dotman
  • 105
  • 4

Additive Chernoff

Suppose $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ are i.i.d. random variables, taking values in $\{0,1\}$. Let $p=\mathrm{E}\left[X_i\right]$ and $\varepsilon>0$.

\begin{gather*} \operatorname{Pr}\left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \geq p+\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p+\varepsilon}\right)^{p+\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p+\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n } \\ \operatorname{Pr} \left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \leq p-\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p-\varepsilon}\right)^{p-\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p-\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n} \end{gather*}

where $$ D(x \mathbin\| y)=x \ln \frac{x}{y}+(1-x) \ln \left(\frac{1-x}{1-y}\right). $$

  1. For sums of i.i.d random variables, is there any bound tighter than the additive Chernoff?
  2. Using the result presented in this question on Theoretical Computer Science StackExchange, I believe I can use the additive form for sums of independent (not necessarily iid) Bernoullis. Is there any bound that outperforms additive Chernoff in this scenario?

Additive Chernoff

Suppose $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ are i.i.d. random variables, taking values in $\{0,1\}$. Let $p=\mathrm{E}\left[X_i\right]$ and $\varepsilon>0$.

\begin{gather*} \operatorname{Pr}\left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \geq p+\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p+\varepsilon}\right)^{p+\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p+\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n } \\ \operatorname{Pr} \left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \leq p-\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p-\varepsilon}\right)^{p-\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p-\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n} \end{gather*}

where $$ D(x \mathbin\| y)=x \ln \frac{x}{y}+(1-x) \ln \left(\frac{1-x}{1-y}\right). $$

  1. For sums of i.i.d random variables, is there any bound tighter than the additive Chernoff?
  2. Using the result presented in this question on Theoretical Computer Science StackExchange, I believe I can use the additive form for sums of independent (not necessarily iid) Bernoullis. Is there any bound that outperforms additive Chernoff in this scenario?

Additive Chernoff

Suppose $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ are i.i.d. random variables, taking values in $\{0,1\}$. Let $p=\mathrm{E}\left[X_i\right]$ and $\varepsilon>0$.

\begin{gather*} \operatorname{Pr}\left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \geq p+\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p+\varepsilon}\right)^{p+\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p+\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n } \\ \operatorname{Pr} \left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \leq p-\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p-\varepsilon}\right)^{p-\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p-\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n} \end{gather*}

where $$ D(x \mathbin\| y)=x \ln \frac{x}{y}+(1-x) \ln \left(\frac{1-x}{1-y}\right). $$

  1. For sums of i.i.d random variables, is there any bound tighter than the additive Chernoff?
capitalisation of names
Source Link
David Roberts
  • 35.5k
  • 11
  • 124
  • 349

Bounds tighter than the additive chernoffChernoff

Additive chernoffChernoff

Suppose $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ are i.i.d. random variables, taking values in $\{0,1\}$. Let $p=\mathrm{E}\left[X_i\right]$ and $\varepsilon>0$.

\begin{gather*} \operatorname{Pr}\left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \geq p+\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p+\varepsilon}\right)^{p+\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p+\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n } \\ \operatorname{Pr} \left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \leq p-\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p-\varepsilon}\right)^{p-\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p-\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n} \end{gather*}

where $$ D(x \mathbin\| y)=x \ln \frac{x}{y}+(1-x) \ln \left(\frac{1-x}{1-y}\right). $$

  1. For sums of i.i.d random variables, is there any bound tighter than the additive chernoffChernoff?
  2. Using the result presented in this question on Theoretical Computer Science StackExchange, I believe I can use the additive form for sums of independent (not necessarily iid) bernoullisBernoullis. Is there any bound that outperforms additive chernoffChernoff in this scenario?

Bounds tighter than the additive chernoff

Additive chernoff

Suppose $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ are i.i.d. random variables, taking values in $\{0,1\}$. Let $p=\mathrm{E}\left[X_i\right]$ and $\varepsilon>0$.

\begin{gather*} \operatorname{Pr}\left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \geq p+\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p+\varepsilon}\right)^{p+\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p+\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n } \\ \operatorname{Pr} \left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \leq p-\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p-\varepsilon}\right)^{p-\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p-\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n} \end{gather*}

where $$ D(x \mathbin\| y)=x \ln \frac{x}{y}+(1-x) \ln \left(\frac{1-x}{1-y}\right). $$

  1. For sums of i.i.d random variables, is there any bound tighter than the additive chernoff?
  2. Using the result presented in this question on Theoretical Computer Science StackExchange, I believe I can use the additive form for sums of independent (not necessarily iid) bernoullis. Is there any bound that outperforms additive chernoff in this scenario?

Bounds tighter than the additive Chernoff

Additive Chernoff

Suppose $X_1, \ldots, X_n$ are i.i.d. random variables, taking values in $\{0,1\}$. Let $p=\mathrm{E}\left[X_i\right]$ and $\varepsilon>0$.

\begin{gather*} \operatorname{Pr}\left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \geq p+\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p+\varepsilon}\right)^{p+\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p-\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p+\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n } \\ \operatorname{Pr} \left(\frac{1}{n} \sum X_i \leq p-\varepsilon\right) \leq\left(\left(\frac{p}{p-\varepsilon}\right)^{p-\varepsilon}\left(\frac{1-p}{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^{1-p+\varepsilon}\right)^n=e^{-D(p-\varepsilon \mathbin\| p) n} \end{gather*}

where $$ D(x \mathbin\| y)=x \ln \frac{x}{y}+(1-x) \ln \left(\frac{1-x}{1-y}\right). $$

  1. For sums of i.i.d random variables, is there any bound tighter than the additive Chernoff?
  2. Using the result presented in this question on Theoretical Computer Science StackExchange, I believe I can use the additive form for sums of independent (not necessarily iid) Bernoullis. Is there any bound that outperforms additive Chernoff in this scenario?
added 12 characters in body
Source Link
Dotman
  • 105
  • 4
Loading
Typo; name of question; deleted "thanks"
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69
Loading
Source Link
Dotman
  • 105
  • 4
Loading