Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 11, 2010 at 16:04 comment added Dan Petersen May has some notes on his webpage: math.uchicago.edu/~may/MISCMaster.html
Nov 11, 2010 at 12:07 comment added James Griffin Is there a good reference discussing this result? My copy of Hatcher's AT now seems a little less complete...
Nov 10, 2010 at 18:36 comment added Pete L. Clark @Ryan: yes, I went to Chicago, yes May was my teacher for algebraic topology (of both the undergraduate and graduate varieties) and yes, I graduated in 1998, safely before he became interested in this subject.
Nov 10, 2010 at 17:16 comment added Dan Petersen Jonathan Barmak's thesis is definitely not in French. :) The abstract and introduction are in Spanish, though. As for how to compute the fundamental group of a concretely given CW complex, I can only give two tips: (i) use van Kampen wherever possible; (ii) think of the 1-cells as generators and 2-cells as relations.
Nov 10, 2010 at 17:06 vote accept Abhishek Parab
Nov 10, 2010 at 17:05 comment added Abhishek Parab This result is fantastic! (This being my first course in Alg Topology, I didn't know weak homotopy equivalence definition, but looked up.) So now may I ask, how one calculates the fund group of a CW complex 'efficiently'? Unfortunately, Barmak's thesis seems to be in French.
Nov 10, 2010 at 15:54 comment added Ryan Reich You went to Chicago, right? It must have been before Peter May started to love this theorem; he taught a summer course on it in 2003.
Nov 10, 2010 at 15:25 comment added Pete L. Clark +1: This is such a striking result that I am almost upset that no one told me about it in the algebraic topology classes I took in my youth.
Nov 10, 2010 at 13:01 history answered Dan Petersen CC BY-SA 2.5