Timeline for Comparative between Kobayashi hyperbolicity and hyperbolicity in the sense of Koszul
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2023 at 1:04 | answer | added | AmorFati | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 25, 2023 at 18:52 | comment | added | Moishe Kohan | Well, then the answer to your question is obviously negative. You just have to understand the definition and some basic properties which you find in any source discussing Kobayashi-hyperbolicity. | |
| Sep 25, 2023 at 18:47 | comment | added | Samir | A closed locally flat manifold (affine) is hyperbolic in the sense of Koszul if its universal covering is affinely diffeomorphic to a sharply convex cone in ℝⁿ. Sharp convex means a convex domain in ℝⁿ containing no lines. | |
| Sep 25, 2023 at 18:22 | comment | added | Moishe Kohan | Kobayashi-hyperbolicity is defined for complex manifolds. What is Koszul's definition for affine-flat(?) manifolds? | |
| Sep 25, 2023 at 17:36 | history | asked | Samir | CC BY-SA 4.0 |