Skip to main content
Changing title phrase to more common English phrasing. (Doubt is used as "question" mainly in India but not much elsewhere.)
Link
JoshuaZ
  • 7k
  • 2
  • 27
  • 59

Doubt in Question about the paper "Infinitely many monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces"

Doubt in the paper "Infinently"Infinitely many monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces"

In the paper "Infinently"Infinitely many monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces" by Renato Vianna, the author constructconstructs an infinite ammountamount of non symplectomorphic-symplectomorphic monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces.

From what I understand, the basic idea is the following. Let's focus on the case of $\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^2$, so the Delzant polytope is a triangle and the central fiber is known to be monotone. Then we apply nodal trades to the vertices, and let them slide troughthrough this monotone fiber. Then we want to visualize the fibration in another way, so that the new created fiber does not lie on the eigenline, and we apply a mutation so that we are able to visualize the desired fiber.

What I fail to understand is why iswill the fiber that will replace the previous monotone fiber be monotone  ? Is Is this a straightforward thing to see, or is there some depth to it  ? Any insight is appreciated.

Doubt in the paper "Infinently many monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces"

In the paper "Infinently many monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces" by Renato Vianna, the author construct an infinite ammount of non symplectomorphic monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces.

From what I understand, the basic idea is the following. Let's focus on the case of $\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^2$ so the Delzant polytope is a triangle and the central fiber is known to be monotone. Then we apply nodal trades to the vertices, and let them slide trough this monotone fiber. Then we want to visualize the fibration in another way so that the new created fiber does not lie on the eigenline, and we apply a mutation so that we are able to visualize the desired fiber.

What I fail to understand is why is the fiber that will replace the previous monotone fiber be monotone  ? Is this a straightforward thing to see or is there some depth to it  ? Any insight is appreciated.

Doubt in the paper "Infinitely many monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces"

In the paper "Infinitely many monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces" by Renato Vianna, the author constructs an infinite amount of non-symplectomorphic monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces.

From what I understand, the basic idea is the following. Let's focus on the case of $\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^2$, so the Delzant polytope is a triangle and the central fiber is known to be monotone. Then we apply nodal trades to the vertices and let them slide through this monotone fiber. Then we want to visualize the fibration in another way, so that the new created fiber does not lie on the eigenline, and we apply a mutation so that we are able to visualize the desired fiber.

What I fail to understand is why will the fiber that will replace the previous monotone fiber be monotone? Is this a straightforward thing to see, or is there some depth to it? Any insight is appreciated.

Source Link
Someone
  • 791
  • 5
  • 11

Doubt in the paper "Infinently many monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces"

In the paper "Infinently many monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces" by Renato Vianna, the author construct an infinite ammount of non symplectomorphic monotone Lagrangian tori in del Pezzo surfaces.

From what I understand, the basic idea is the following. Let's focus on the case of $\mathbb{C}\mathbb{P}^2$ so the Delzant polytope is a triangle and the central fiber is known to be monotone. Then we apply nodal trades to the vertices, and let them slide trough this monotone fiber. Then we want to visualize the fibration in another way so that the new created fiber does not lie on the eigenline, and we apply a mutation so that we are able to visualize the desired fiber.

What I fail to understand is why is the fiber that will replace the previous monotone fiber be monotone ? Is this a straightforward thing to see or is there some depth to it ? Any insight is appreciated.