Timeline for Does this inequality hold for the cumulant generating function?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2023 at 19:17 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Sep 24, 2023 at 18:51 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 125 characters in body
|
| Sep 24, 2023 at 18:17 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 734 characters in body
|
| Sep 24, 2023 at 17:48 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 638 characters in body
|
| Sep 24, 2023 at 17:41 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Sep 24, 2023 at 17:30 | history | edited | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 7 characters in body
|
| Sep 24, 2023 at 17:10 | comment | added | Jiacai Liu | Thanks for your advices, the edit has been rolled back. | |
| Sep 24, 2023 at 17:08 | vote | accept | Jiacai Liu | ||
| Sep 24, 2023 at 17:08 | vote | accept | Jiacai Liu | ||
| Sep 24, 2023 at 17:08 | |||||
| Sep 24, 2023 at 16:57 | comment | added | Iosif Pinelis | @JiacaiLiu : Such edits, invalidating valid answers, should never be made. Also, in view of approximation, the boundedness clearly does not help here at all. Please roll back your edit. | |
| Sep 24, 2023 at 16:48 | comment | added | Jiacai Liu | I‘m sorry that I forgot to include the condition "$X$ is bounded " in my post. I have edited my post already. | |
| Sep 24, 2023 at 16:33 | history | answered | Iosif Pinelis | CC BY-SA 4.0 |