Timeline for Is there a subgroup of a non-abelian $p$-group $G$ with a large nilpotency class?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2023 at 11:20 | comment | added | mme | I see, I agree the desired identity holds then. Thanks for the nice answer! | |
| Sep 21, 2023 at 6:05 | comment | added | YCor | @mme thanks for noticing. Indeed the correction is rather that the first 2.7 should have been 2.6 (now fixed) while 2.8 is zero. | |
| Sep 21, 2023 at 6:04 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed typo
|
| Sep 20, 2023 at 22:33 | comment | added | mme | I assume the second 2.7 should read 2.8. Beyond this, are the defining brackets correct as written? Taking $x = e_1 + e_2$ and $y = e_2$ I seem to find $[x, [x, [x, [x, y]]]] = -2e_9 - e_{10}$. Have I repeatedly made some arithmetic error? | |
| Sep 20, 2023 at 19:47 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed typo
|
| Sep 20, 2023 at 19:27 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Two typos, and trivial edits
|
| Sep 20, 2023 at 14:29 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed typo
|
| Sep 20, 2023 at 12:41 | vote | accept | solver6 | ||
| Sep 20, 2023 at 11:15 | history | answered | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |