Timeline for Strongly correlated? Terminology question
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2014 at 17:50 | vote | accept | Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen | ||
| Nov 9, 2010 at 22:03 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | So.... It seems that the answer given was correct, but maybe only shows why a different question should have been asked. | |
| Nov 9, 2010 at 21:59 | comment | added | Michael Hardy | Correct. A STRICTLY bigger X entails a strictly bigger Y. I was hasty. | |
| Nov 9, 2010 at 21:29 | comment | added | Michael Hardy |
But $Y$ is not in general determined by $X$. Simplest case: $$ \Omega = \{ (0,0), (0,1), (1,0), (1,1)\}. $$ $$ X(i,j) = i $$ $$ Y(i,j) = 10i + j $$ If $X=0$ then $Y$ may be either 0 or 1; if $X=1$ then $Y$ may be either 10 or 11. A larger $X$ value entails a larger $Y$ value. But $X$ does not determine $Y$.
|
|
| Nov 9, 2010 at 21:03 | history | answered | Louigi Addario-Berry | CC BY-SA 2.5 |