Skip to main content
deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Leo Alonso
  • 9.2k
  • 2
  • 43
  • 57

A quasi compact and quasi-separated scheme has its derived category of sheaves of modules with quasi-coherent cohomology generated by perfect complexes. This is actually a theorem of Bondal and Van de Berg Generators and representability of functors in commutative and noncommutative geometry. However, there are non-separated schemes that, despite the previous theorem, do not posses the resolution property, see the paper by Totaro The resolution property for schemes and stacks for a discussion of the subtleties of the issue.

The proof by Bondal-Van den Bergh uses Thomason-Neeman localization: a perfect complex overtover a dense open subset extends. This does not hold for vector bundles in general. This is where the difference between compact generation and generation by vector bundles lies.

A quasi compact and quasi-separated scheme has its derived category of sheaves of modules with quasi-coherent cohomology generated by perfect complexes. This is actually a theorem of Bondal and Van de Berg Generators and representability of functors in commutative and noncommutative geometry. However, there are non-separated schemes that, despite the previous theorem, do not posses the resolution property, see the paper by Totaro The resolution property for schemes and stacks for a discussion of the subtleties of the issue.

The proof by Bondal-Van den Bergh uses Thomason-Neeman localization: a perfect complex overt a dense open subset extends. This does not hold for vector bundles in general. This is where the difference between compact generation and generation by vector bundles lies.

A quasi compact and quasi-separated scheme has its derived category of sheaves of modules with quasi-coherent cohomology generated by perfect complexes. This is actually a theorem of Bondal and Van de Berg Generators and representability of functors in commutative and noncommutative geometry. However, there are non-separated schemes that, despite the previous theorem, do not posses the resolution property, see the paper by Totaro The resolution property for schemes and stacks for a discussion of the subtleties of the issue.

The proof by Bondal-Van den Bergh uses Thomason-Neeman localization: a perfect complex over a dense open subset extends. This does not hold for vector bundles in general. This is where the difference between compact generation and generation by vector bundles lies.

added 270 characters in body
Source Link
Leo Alonso
  • 9.2k
  • 2
  • 43
  • 57

A quasi compact and quasi-separated scheme has its derived category of sheaves of modules with quasi-coherent cohomology generated by perfect complexes. This is actually a theorem of Bondal and Van de Berg Generators and representability of functors in commutative and noncommutative geometry. However, there are non-separated schemes that, despite the previous theorem, do not posses the resolution property, see the paper by Totaro The resolution property for schemes and stacks for a discussion of the subtleties of the issue.

The proof by Bondal-Van den Bergh uses Thomason-Neeman localization: a perfect complex overt a dense open subset extends. This does not hold for vector bundles in general. This is where the difference between compact generation and generation by vector bundles lies.

A quasi compact and quasi-separated scheme has its derived category of sheaves of modules with quasi-coherent cohomology generated by perfect complexes. This is actually a theorem of Bondal and Van de Berg Generators and representability of functors in commutative and noncommutative geometry. However, there are non-separated schemes that, despite the previous theorem, do not posses the resolution property, see the paper by Totaro The resolution property for schemes and stacks for a discussion of the subtleties of the issue.

A quasi compact and quasi-separated scheme has its derived category of sheaves of modules with quasi-coherent cohomology generated by perfect complexes. This is actually a theorem of Bondal and Van de Berg Generators and representability of functors in commutative and noncommutative geometry. However, there are non-separated schemes that, despite the previous theorem, do not posses the resolution property, see the paper by Totaro The resolution property for schemes and stacks for a discussion of the subtleties of the issue.

The proof by Bondal-Van den Bergh uses Thomason-Neeman localization: a perfect complex overt a dense open subset extends. This does not hold for vector bundles in general. This is where the difference between compact generation and generation by vector bundles lies.

corrected typo
Source Link
Leo Alonso
  • 9.2k
  • 2
  • 43
  • 57

A quasi compact and quasi-separated scheme has its derived category of sheaves of modules with quasi-coherent cosmologycohomology generated by perfect complexes. This is actually a theorem of Bondal and Van de Berg Generators and representability of functors in commutative and noncommutative geometry. However, there are non-separated schemes that, despite the previous theorem, do not posses the resolution property, see the paper by Totaro The resolution property for schemes and stacks for a discussion of the subtleties of the issue.

A quasi compact and quasi-separated scheme has its derived category of sheaves of modules with quasi-coherent cosmology generated by perfect complexes. This is actually a theorem of Bondal and Van de Berg Generators and representability of functors in commutative and noncommutative geometry. However, there are non-separated schemes that, despite the previous theorem, do not posses the resolution property, see the paper by Totaro The resolution property for schemes and stacks for a discussion of the subtleties of the issue.

A quasi compact and quasi-separated scheme has its derived category of sheaves of modules with quasi-coherent cohomology generated by perfect complexes. This is actually a theorem of Bondal and Van de Berg Generators and representability of functors in commutative and noncommutative geometry. However, there are non-separated schemes that, despite the previous theorem, do not posses the resolution property, see the paper by Totaro The resolution property for schemes and stacks for a discussion of the subtleties of the issue.

Source Link
Leo Alonso
  • 9.2k
  • 2
  • 43
  • 57
Loading