Timeline for How do these definitions of factorization algebra compare?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2023 at 0:58 | vote | accept | Ken | ||
| Oct 3, 2023 at 0:57 | answer | added | Ken | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 17, 2023 at 9:17 | comment | added | Ken | Your suggestion for Definition 3 is totally right, and I accepted it. But your suggestion for Definition 1 is probably off the mark. If we take all $U_i$ distinct, then the resulting collection of objects will not be a simplicial object, but only a semisimplicial object. (Notice that I am taking the normalized chain complex, which kills the degenerate part.) Thank you for your suggestion! | |
| S Sep 17, 2023 at 9:14 | history | edited | Ken | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed a typo in Definition 3 (Weiss cover of U)
|
| S Sep 17, 2023 at 9:14 | history | suggested | Daniel Bruegmann | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
make Definition 1 closer to [CG] by adding "all distinct", Weiss cover of U in Definition 3
|
| Sep 17, 2023 at 7:38 | comment | added | Daniel Bruegmann | (I have suggested an edit and it is in the review queue. Please disregard it, I believe there should instead be a different edit to make Definition 1 match [CG, p.212].) | |
| Sep 17, 2023 at 7:20 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Sep 17, 2023 at 9:14 | |||||
| Sep 17, 2023 at 1:24 | history | edited | Ken | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed grammatical errors
|
| Sep 17, 2023 at 1:19 | history | edited | Ken | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed some typos
|
| Sep 16, 2023 at 17:51 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Sep 16, 2023 at 17:33 | answer | added | Daniel Bruegmann | timeline score: 7 | |
| Sep 16, 2023 at 6:20 | history | asked | Ken | CC BY-SA 4.0 |