Timeline for Invariant measure of geodesic flow on unit tangent bundle of a modular surface
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2023 at 13:50 | vote | accept | user473085 | ||
| Sep 6, 2023 at 5:55 | comment | added | Sam Nead | Oh, and if my answer in fact answers your question (see the last paragraph) you should “accept” it by checking the tick mark. | |
| Sep 6, 2023 at 0:04 | comment | added | user473085 | Thank you. I'll edit the post. | |
| Aug 31, 2023 at 19:18 | history | edited | Sam Nead | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed typo
|
| Aug 31, 2023 at 10:03 | comment | added | Sam Nead | I've corrected my previous answer - there I got the coordinate transform to $(c, r)$ coordinates right, but I somehow thought that $(c, r) = (x, y)$, which of course is wrong. I've added a discussion of invariance under the geodesic flow at the end. If that is your main question, you might edit the original post to make that clear? | |
| Aug 31, 2023 at 10:00 | history | edited | Sam Nead | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Heavy edit of previous answer, which had problems.
|
| Aug 31, 2023 at 9:58 | history | undeleted | Sam Nead | ||
| Aug 31, 2023 at 6:53 | history | deleted | Sam Nead | via Vote | |
| Aug 31, 2023 at 5:23 | comment | added | user473085 | Thank you for useful your comment. I understood that this is a coordinate transformation. I'm curious whether the product measure is an invariant measure. | |
| Aug 25, 2023 at 9:54 | history | edited | Sam Nead | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting and wording
|
| Aug 25, 2023 at 7:56 | history | answered | Sam Nead | CC BY-SA 4.0 |