Skip to main content
added 22 characters in body
Source Link
Andrej Bauer
  • 48.8k
  • 11
  • 131
  • 240

[Update 20152024-04-15: The preprint The countable reals is now available.]

A set $A$ is uncountable if it is not countable. AFor an inhabited set, a stronger property is sequence-avoiding: for every sequence $\mathbb{N} \to A$ there is an element of $A$ that is not a term of the sequence.

[Update 2015-04-15: The preprint The countable reals is now available.]

A set $A$ is uncountable if it is not countable. A stronger property is sequence-avoiding: for every sequence $\mathbb{N} \to A$ there is an element of $A$ that is not a term of the sequence.

[Update 2024-04-15: The preprint The countable reals is now available.]

A set $A$ is uncountable if it is not countable. For an inhabited set, a stronger property is sequence-avoiding: for every sequence $\mathbb{N} \to A$ there is an element of $A$ that is not a term of the sequence.

added 115 characters in body
Source Link
Andrej Bauer
  • 48.8k
  • 11
  • 131
  • 240

[Update 2015-04-15: The preprint The countable reals is now available.]

Please allow me to list some basic observations that might clear up things. I work constructively (without excluded middle) and without the axiom of choice, and assuming powersets are available.

Please allow me to list some basic observations that might clear up things. I work constructively (without excluded middle) and without the axiom of choice, and assuming powersets are available.

[Update 2015-04-15: The preprint The countable reals is now available.]

Please allow me to list some basic observations that might clear up things. I work constructively (without excluded middle) and without the axiom of choice, and assuming powersets are available.

Typos, while this is on the front page
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

Proof. Cantor's diagonal method is constructive. Given $f : \mathbb{N} \to \lbrace 0, 1\rbrace^\mathbb{N}$, the sequence $n \mapsto 1 - f(n)(n)$ differs from $f(n)$ in the $n$-th place. Similarly, given $g : \mathbb{N} \to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$, the set $\lbrace n \in \mathbb{N} \mid n \notin f(n) \rbrace$ differs from $f(n)$$g(n)$ at $n$. $\Box$

It has also been known since at least the 1980's1980s that in the effective topos $\mathbb{R}_d$ is subcountable and sequence-avoiding.

Proof. Cantor's diagonal method is constructive. Given $f : \mathbb{N} \to \lbrace 0, 1\rbrace^\mathbb{N}$, the sequence $n \mapsto 1 - f(n)(n)$ differs from $f(n)$ in the $n$-th place. Similarly, given $g : \mathbb{N} \to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$, the set $\lbrace n \in \mathbb{N} \mid n \notin f(n) \rbrace$ differs from $f(n)$ at $n$. $\Box$

It has also been known since at least the 1980's that in the effective topos $\mathbb{R}_d$ is subcountable and sequence-avoiding.

Proof. Cantor's diagonal method is constructive. Given $f : \mathbb{N} \to \lbrace 0, 1\rbrace^\mathbb{N}$, the sequence $n \mapsto 1 - f(n)(n)$ differs from $f(n)$ in the $n$-th place. Similarly, given $g : \mathbb{N} \to \mathcal{P}(\mathbb{N})$, the set $\lbrace n \in \mathbb{N} \mid n \notin f(n) \rbrace$ differs from $g(n)$ at $n$. $\Box$

It has also been known since at least the 1980s that in the effective topos $\mathbb{R}_d$ is subcountable and sequence-avoiding.

SPELLING
Source Link
Aaron Meyerowitz
  • 30.1k
  • 1
  • 48
  • 104
Loading
deleted 259 characters in body
Source Link
Andrej Bauer
  • 48.8k
  • 11
  • 131
  • 240
Loading
Rollback to Revision 4 - Edit approval overridden by post owner or moderator
Source Link
Andrej Bauer
  • 48.8k
  • 11
  • 131
  • 240
Loading
The reals are a set in CZF per comments elsewhere on this question or https://mathstodon.xyz/@MartinEscardo/110944257074282172
Source Link
Loading
added 431 characters in body
Source Link
Andrej Bauer
  • 48.8k
  • 11
  • 131
  • 240
Loading
added 1 character in body
Source Link
Sam Hopkins
  • 24.2k
  • 5
  • 97
  • 171
Loading
Proofreading
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69
Loading
Source Link
Andrej Bauer
  • 48.8k
  • 11
  • 131
  • 240
Loading