Timeline for Alexandrov-Fenchel theorem for Riemannian manifolds [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 4, 2023 at 1:29 | history | closed |
M. Winter Max Horn Mikhail Katz user44191 Carl-Fredrik Nyberg Brodda |
Needs details or clarity | |
| Nov 16, 2023 at 0:47 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 4, 2023 at 1:29 | |||||
| Nov 16, 2023 at 0:04 | history | edited | Michael Hardy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Sep 15, 2023 at 4:46 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 5, 2023 at 3:05 | |||||
| Sep 13, 2023 at 5:44 | comment | added | Ali Taghavi | @DanielAsimov Perhaps one possible sense could be the following: We change the metric on $\mathbb{R}^n$ and compute the volum wrt the new metric. The convexity can have two interpretation: wrt the straight lines or wrt the geodesics of metrics. Is it a reasonable sense for consideration of the generalized Fenchel theorem? | |
| Aug 18, 2023 at 3:29 | comment | added | Daniel Asimov | In an arbitrary riemannian manifold, it is not clear what a linear combination xE + yM of two subsets E, M means. Maybe you want to restrict your question to cases where that makes sense. | |
| Aug 17, 2023 at 20:02 | history | edited | matilda | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
| S Aug 17, 2023 at 19:55 | review | First questions | |||
| Aug 17, 2023 at 21:23 | |||||
| S Aug 17, 2023 at 19:55 | history | asked | matilda | CC BY-SA 4.0 |