Timeline for Which rectangles can be cut into finitely many rectangles all with same perimeter and different areas?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 13, 2023 at 6:01 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | Yes sorry, I mean no "inclusion up to rigid movement". Here the 1x1 square is included in any of the 1x2 rectangles, and each of them is included in the others. | |
Aug 13, 2023 at 4:09 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | @Pietro, take a $3\times3$ square, cut it into a $1\times1$ square in the middle, and four $1\times2$ rectangles surrounding the small square. That's five rectangles, no one of which is included in some other. But perhaps I misunderstand your criteria. | |
Aug 12, 2023 at 10:18 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | it seems quite hard even to cut a square into a finite "inclusion co-chain" of rectangles, that is in such a way that none of them is included in some other. I guess not less than 7 rectangles are needed. | |
Aug 12, 2023 at 9:43 | history | asked | Nandakumar R | CC BY-SA 4.0 |