Timeline for Chinese remainder theorem for composition
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 11, 2023 at 23:05 | comment | added | LSpice | Re, thanks. It is clear to me now. | |
Aug 11, 2023 at 22:59 | comment | added | Will Sawin | @LSpice It was missing a few words, fixed, though it may still be a bit unclear. | |
Aug 11, 2023 at 22:58 | history | edited | Will Sawin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 25 characters in body
|
Aug 11, 2023 at 21:58 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typos
|
Aug 11, 2023 at 21:57 | comment | added | LSpice |
I have some trouble parsing the sentence "completely free except that $f$ modulo …" at the end of the second paragraph. What is the claim about the residue? (There's an equals sign, but that seems just to be saying that two $\gcd$s are equal. Incidentally, on that note, \gcd is pre-defined, and need not be \operatorname d, though of course it's harmless.)
|
|
Aug 11, 2023 at 21:32 | comment | added | mtheorylord | Ah, I see, thank you for the example. I'm still looking for general results though about $f$ modulo compositions. | |
Aug 11, 2023 at 21:25 | history | answered | Will Sawin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |