Skip to main content
added 62 characters in body
Source Link

Ok so I just realized there is a very simple operator calculus reason for this (I apologize if my answers are annoying since they are very closely related but I am using this to document my ideas and also learning for myself how this works).

Consider the operator $H: f(s) \rightarrow xf(s+1)$. It then follows quite naturally that

$$ f(s) + xf(s+1) + x^2 f(s+2) + ... = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} H^n[f(s)] = \frac{1}{1-H}$$

But recall the geometric series $\frac{1}{1-x}$ has two series of convergence $1+x+x^2 + x^3 ... $ and the laurent series $-\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{x^2} - \frac{1}{x^3} ... $

Therefore:

$$ \frac{1}{1-H} = -H^{-1} - H^{-2} - H^{-3} .... = -\frac{f(s-1)}{x}-\frac{f(s-2)}{x^2} - \frac{f(s-3)}{x^3} ... $$

Evaluating both series at $s=0$ then gives us that

$$ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f(n) = \left[\frac{1}{1-H}\right]_{@s=0} = -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f(-n)x^{-n} $$

And that is the connection that you found. I'm not sure what the ramifications of this formula entail but there is a (non optimistic) chance it could be deep.

For example the Jacobi theta function $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^{n^2} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \frac{e^{2i\pi n} - 1}{e^{2i\pi \sqrt{n}} - 1}x^n $$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^{n^2} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \frac{e^{2i\pi n} - 1}{e^{2i\pi \sqrt{n}} - 1}x^{-n} $ so we could try to bash it with this thing. What's curious is that once $n$ goes negative then $\sqrt{n}$ goes imaginary and $e^{2i\pi \sqrt{n}} $ starts to grow exponentially fast so this series somewhat shockingly actually will converge and produce something (up to a choice of branch cut). Is that the "natural" continuation of the Jacobi theta function? I'm not sure, but if it doesn't work its not obvious to me why Edit: i spoke too soon. I have the resultant series is just 0 everywhere and so isn’t a very satisfying continuation at all.

Ok so I just realized there is a very simple operator calculus reason for this (I apologize if my answers are annoying since they are very closely related but I am using this to document my ideas and also learning for myself how this works).

Consider the operator $H: f(s) \rightarrow xf(s+1)$. It then follows quite naturally that

$$ f(s) + xf(s+1) + x^2 f(s+2) + ... = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} H^n[f(s)] = \frac{1}{1-H}$$

But recall the geometric series $\frac{1}{1-x}$ has two series of convergence $1+x+x^2 + x^3 ... $ and the laurent series $-\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{x^2} - \frac{1}{x^3} ... $

Therefore:

$$ \frac{1}{1-H} = -H^{-1} - H^{-2} - H^{-3} .... = -\frac{f(s-1)}{x}-\frac{f(s-2)}{x^2} - \frac{f(s-3)}{x^3} ... $$

Evaluating both series at $s=0$ then gives us that

$$ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f(n) = \left[\frac{1}{1-H}\right]_{@s=0} = -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f(-n)x^{-n} $$

And that is the connection that you found. I'm not sure what the ramifications of this formula entail but there is a (non optimistic) chance it could be deep.

For example the Jacobi theta function $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^{n^2} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \frac{e^{2i\pi n} - 1}{e^{2i\pi \sqrt{n}} - 1}x^n $ so we could try to bash it with this thing. What's curious is that once $n$ goes negative then $\sqrt{n}$ goes imaginary and $e^{2i\pi \sqrt{n}} $ starts to grow exponentially fast so this series somewhat shockingly actually will converge and produce something (up to a choice of branch cut). Is that the "natural" continuation of the Jacobi theta function? I'm not sure, but if it doesn't work its not obvious to me why.

Ok so I just realized there is a very simple operator calculus reason for this (I apologize if my answers are annoying since they are very closely related but I am using this to document my ideas and also learning for myself how this works).

Consider the operator $H: f(s) \rightarrow xf(s+1)$. It then follows quite naturally that

$$ f(s) + xf(s+1) + x^2 f(s+2) + ... = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} H^n[f(s)] = \frac{1}{1-H}$$

But recall the geometric series $\frac{1}{1-x}$ has two series of convergence $1+x+x^2 + x^3 ... $ and the laurent series $-\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{x^2} - \frac{1}{x^3} ... $

Therefore:

$$ \frac{1}{1-H} = -H^{-1} - H^{-2} - H^{-3} .... = -\frac{f(s-1)}{x}-\frac{f(s-2)}{x^2} - \frac{f(s-3)}{x^3} ... $$

Evaluating both series at $s=0$ then gives us that

$$ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f(n) = \left[\frac{1}{1-H}\right]_{@s=0} = -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f(-n)x^{-n} $$

And that is the connection that you found. I'm not sure what the ramifications of this formula entail but there is a (non optimistic) chance it could be deep.

For example the Jacobi theta function $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^{n^2} = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \frac{e^{2i\pi n} - 1}{e^{2i\pi \sqrt{n}} - 1}x^{-n} $ so we could try to bash it with this thing. What's curious is that once $n$ goes negative then $\sqrt{n}$ goes imaginary and $e^{2i\pi \sqrt{n}} $ starts to grow exponentially fast so this series somewhat shockingly actually will converge and produce something (up to a choice of branch cut). Is that the "natural" continuation of the Jacobi theta function? Edit: i spoke too soon. I have the resultant series is just 0 everywhere and so isn’t a very satisfying continuation at all.

added 573 characters in body
Source Link

Ok so I just realized there is a very simple operator calculus reason for this (I apologize if my answers are annoying since they are very closely related but I am using this to document my ideas and also learning for myself how this works).

Consider the operator $H: f(s) \rightarrow xf(s+1)$. It then follows quite naturally that

$$ f(s) + xf(s+1) + x^2 f(s+2) + ... = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} H^n[f(s)] = \frac{1}{1-H}$$

But recall the geometric series $\frac{1}{1-x}$ has two series of convergence $1+x+x^2 + x^3 ... $ and the laurent series $-\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{x^2} - \frac{1}{x^3} ... $

Therefore:

$$ \frac{1}{1-H} = -H^{-1} - H^{-2} - H^{-3} .... = -\frac{f(s-1)}{x}-\frac{f(s-2)}{x^2} - \frac{f(s-3)}{x^3} ... $$

Evaluating both series at $s=0$ then gives us that

$$ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f(n) = \left[\frac{1}{1-H}\right]_{@s=0} = -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f(-n)x^{-n} $$

And that is the connection that you found. I'm not sure what the ramifications of this formula entail but there is a (non optimistic) chance it could be deep.

For example the Jacobi theta function $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^{n^2} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(2\pi n)}{2\sqrt{n} \sin(2\pi \sqrt{n})}x^n $$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^{n^2} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \frac{e^{2i\pi n} - 1}{e^{2i\pi \sqrt{n}} - 1}x^n $ so we could try to bash it with this thing. What's curious is that once $n$ goes negative then $\sqrt{n}$ goes imaginary and $\sin(2\pi \sqrt{n})$$e^{2i\pi \sqrt{n}} $ starts to grow exponentially fast so this series somewhat shockingly actually will converge and produce something (up to a choice of branch cut). Is that the "natural" continuation of the Jacobi theta function? I'm not sure, but if it doesn't work its not obvious to me why.

Ok so I just realized there is a very simple operator calculus reason for this (I apologize if my answers are annoying since they are very closely related but I am using this to document my ideas and also learning for myself how this works).

Consider the operator $H: f(s) \rightarrow xf(s+1)$. It then follows quite naturally that

$$ f(s) + xf(s+1) + x^2 f(s+2) + ... = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} H^n[f(s)] = \frac{1}{1-H}$$

But recall the geometric series $\frac{1}{1-x}$ has two series of convergence $1+x+x^2 + x^3 ... $ and the laurent series $-\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{x^2} - \frac{1}{x^3} ... $

Therefore:

$$ \frac{1}{1-H} = -H^{-1} - H^{-2} - H^{-3} .... = -\frac{f(s-1)}{x}-\frac{f(s-2)}{x^2} - \frac{f(s-3)}{x^3} ... $$

Evaluating both series at $s=0$ then gives us that

$$ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f(n) = \left[\frac{1}{1-H}\right]_{@s=0} = -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f(-n)x^{-n} $$

And that is the connection that you found. I'm not sure what the ramifications of this formula entail but there is a (non optimistic) chance it could be deep.

For example the Jacobi theta function $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^{n^2} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(2\pi n)}{2\sqrt{n} \sin(2\pi \sqrt{n})}x^n $ so we could try to bash it with this thing. What's curious is that once $n$ goes negative then $\sqrt{n}$ goes imaginary and $\sin(2\pi \sqrt{n})$ starts to grow exponentially fast so this series somewhat shockingly actually will converge and produce something (up to a choice of branch cut). Is that the "natural" continuation of the Jacobi theta function? I'm not sure, but if it doesn't work its not obvious to me why.

Ok so I just realized there is a very simple operator calculus reason for this (I apologize if my answers are annoying since they are very closely related but I am using this to document my ideas and also learning for myself how this works).

Consider the operator $H: f(s) \rightarrow xf(s+1)$. It then follows quite naturally that

$$ f(s) + xf(s+1) + x^2 f(s+2) + ... = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} H^n[f(s)] = \frac{1}{1-H}$$

But recall the geometric series $\frac{1}{1-x}$ has two series of convergence $1+x+x^2 + x^3 ... $ and the laurent series $-\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{x^2} - \frac{1}{x^3} ... $

Therefore:

$$ \frac{1}{1-H} = -H^{-1} - H^{-2} - H^{-3} .... = -\frac{f(s-1)}{x}-\frac{f(s-2)}{x^2} - \frac{f(s-3)}{x^3} ... $$

Evaluating both series at $s=0$ then gives us that

$$ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f(n) = \left[\frac{1}{1-H}\right]_{@s=0} = -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f(-n)x^{-n} $$

And that is the connection that you found. I'm not sure what the ramifications of this formula entail but there is a (non optimistic) chance it could be deep.

For example the Jacobi theta function $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^{n^2} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}} \frac{e^{2i\pi n} - 1}{e^{2i\pi \sqrt{n}} - 1}x^n $ so we could try to bash it with this thing. What's curious is that once $n$ goes negative then $\sqrt{n}$ goes imaginary and $e^{2i\pi \sqrt{n}} $ starts to grow exponentially fast so this series somewhat shockingly actually will converge and produce something (up to a choice of branch cut). Is that the "natural" continuation of the Jacobi theta function? I'm not sure, but if it doesn't work its not obvious to me why.

added 573 characters in body
Source Link

Ok so I just realized there is a very simple operator calculus reason for this (I apologize if my answers are annoying since they are very closely related but I am using this to document my ideas and also learning for myself how this works).

Consider the operator $H: f(s) \rightarrow xf(s+1)$. It then follows quite naturally that

$$ f(s) + xf(s+1) + x^2 f(s+2) + ... = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} H^n[f(s)] = \frac{1}{1-H}$$

But recall the geometric series $\frac{1}{1-x}$ has two series of convergence $1+x+x^2 + x^3 ... $ and the laurent series $-\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{x^2} - \frac{1}{x^3} ... $

Therefore:

$$ \frac{1}{1-H} = -H^{-1} - H^{-2} - H^{-3} .... = -\frac{f(s-1)}{x}-\frac{f(s-2)}{x^2} - \frac{f(s-3)}{x^3} ... $$

Evaluating both series at $s=0$ then gives us that

$$ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f(n) = \left[\frac{1}{1-H}\right]_{@s=0} = -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f(-n)x^{-n} $$

And that is the connection that you found. I'm not sure what the ramifications of this formula entail but there is a (non optimistic) chance it could be deep.

For example the Jacobi theta function $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^{n^2} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(2\pi n)}{2\sqrt{n} \sin(2\pi \sqrt{n})}x^n $ so we could try to bash it with this thing. What's curious is that once $n$ goes negative then $\sqrt{n}$ goes imaginary and $\sin(2\pi \sqrt{n})$ starts to grow exponentially fast so this series somewhat shockingly actually will converge and produce something (up to a choice of branch cut). Is that the "natural" continuation of the Jacobi theta function? I'm not sure, but if it doesn't work its not obvious to me why.

Ok so I just realized there is a very simple operator calculus reason for this (I apologize if my answers are annoying since they are very closely related but I am using this to document my ideas and also learning for myself how this works).

Consider the operator $H: f(s) \rightarrow xf(s+1)$. It then follows quite naturally that

$$ f(s) + xf(s+1) + x^2 f(s+2) + ... = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} H^n[f(s)] = \frac{1}{1-H}$$

But recall the geometric series $\frac{1}{1-x}$ has two series of convergence $1+x+x^2 + x^3 ... $ and the laurent series $-\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{x^2} - \frac{1}{x^3} ... $

Therefore:

$$ \frac{1}{1-H} = -H^{-1} - H^{-2} - H^{-3} .... = -\frac{f(s-1)}{x}-\frac{f(s-2)}{x^2} - \frac{f(s-3)}{x^3} ... $$

Evaluating both series at $s=0$ then gives us that

$$ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f(n) = \left[\frac{1}{1-H}\right]_{@s=0} = -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f(-n)x^{-n} $$

And that is the connection that you found. I'm not sure what the ramifications of this formula entail but there is a (non optimistic) chance it could be deep.

Ok so I just realized there is a very simple operator calculus reason for this (I apologize if my answers are annoying since they are very closely related but I am using this to document my ideas and also learning for myself how this works).

Consider the operator $H: f(s) \rightarrow xf(s+1)$. It then follows quite naturally that

$$ f(s) + xf(s+1) + x^2 f(s+2) + ... = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} H^n[f(s)] = \frac{1}{1-H}$$

But recall the geometric series $\frac{1}{1-x}$ has two series of convergence $1+x+x^2 + x^3 ... $ and the laurent series $-\frac{1}{x} - \frac{1}{x^2} - \frac{1}{x^3} ... $

Therefore:

$$ \frac{1}{1-H} = -H^{-1} - H^{-2} - H^{-3} .... = -\frac{f(s-1)}{x}-\frac{f(s-2)}{x^2} - \frac{f(s-3)}{x^3} ... $$

Evaluating both series at $s=0$ then gives us that

$$ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} f(n) = \left[\frac{1}{1-H}\right]_{@s=0} = -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} f(-n)x^{-n} $$

And that is the connection that you found. I'm not sure what the ramifications of this formula entail but there is a (non optimistic) chance it could be deep.

For example the Jacobi theta function $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} x^{n^2} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{\sin(2\pi n)}{2\sqrt{n} \sin(2\pi \sqrt{n})}x^n $ so we could try to bash it with this thing. What's curious is that once $n$ goes negative then $\sqrt{n}$ goes imaginary and $\sin(2\pi \sqrt{n})$ starts to grow exponentially fast so this series somewhat shockingly actually will converge and produce something (up to a choice of branch cut). Is that the "natural" continuation of the Jacobi theta function? I'm not sure, but if it doesn't work its not obvious to me why.

Source Link
Loading