Skip to main content
Name of Milne; EG -> e.g.
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

No, you shouldn't need any choice for this, and it should still be true if you replace $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$ with any other algebraic closure of $\mathbb{Q}$. Let $K$ be a field (which in our application will be $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$) and let $G$ be a finite group of automorphisms of $K$. Then $K/K^G$ is always a degree $\#(G)$ extension. (See EG, e.g., Milne - Fields and Galois theory Corollary 2.14 and Theorem 3.4.)

The Artin-SchreierArtin–Schreier theorem theorem says that, if $K/F$ is a finite degree extension and $K$ is algebraically closed, then $[K:F] \leq 2$.

Combining the two statements, if $G$ is a finite subgroup of $\text{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$$\operatorname{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$, then $\#(G) \leq 2$.

There is no use of choice in the proof of either of the big tools that I'm using.

No, you shouldn't need any choice for this, and it should still be true if you replace $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$ with any other algebraic closure of $\mathbb{Q}$. Let $K$ be a field (which in our application will be $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$) and let $G$ be a finite group of automorphisms of $K$. Then $K/K^G$ is always a degree $\#(G)$ extension. (See EG Milne Corollary 2.14 and Theorem 3.4.)

The Artin-Schreier theorem says that $K/F$ is a finite degree extension and $K$ is algebraically closed, then $[K:F] \leq 2$.

Combining the two statements, if $G$ is a finite subgroup of $\text{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$, then $\#(G) \leq 2$.

There is no use of choice in the proof of either of the big tools that I'm using.

No, you shouldn't need any choice for this, and it should still be true if you replace $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$ with any other algebraic closure of $\mathbb{Q}$. Let $K$ be a field (which in our application will be $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$) and let $G$ be a finite group of automorphisms of $K$. Then $K/K^G$ is always a degree $\#(G)$ extension. (See, e.g., Milne - Fields and Galois theory Corollary 2.14 and Theorem 3.4.)

The Artin–Schreier theorem says that, if $K/F$ is a finite degree extension and $K$ is algebraically closed, then $[K:F] \leq 2$.

Combining the two statements, if $G$ is a finite subgroup of $\operatorname{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$, then $\#(G) \leq 2$.

There is no use of choice in the proof of either of the big tools that I'm using.

added 1 character in body
Source Link
David E Speyer
  • 156.2k
  • 14
  • 420
  • 763

No, you shouldn't need any choice for this, and it should still be true if you replace $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$ with any other algebraic closure of $\mathbb{Q}$. Let $K$ be a field (which in our application will be $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$) and let $G$ be a finite group of automorphisms of $K$. Then $K/K^G$ is always a degree $\#(G)$ extension. (See EG Milne Corollary 2.14 and Theorem 3.4.)

The Artin-Schreier theorem says that $K/F$ is a finite degree extension and $K$ is algebraically closed, andthen $[K:F] \leq 2$.

Combining the two statements, if $G$ is a finite subgroup of $\text{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$, then $\#(G) \leq 2$.

There is no use of choice in the proof of either of the big tools that I'm using.

No, you shouldn't need any choice for this, and it should still be true if you replace $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$ with any other algebraic closure of $\mathbb{Q}$. Let $K$ be a field (which in our application will be $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$) and let $G$ be a finite group of automorphisms of $K$. Then $K/K^G$ is always a degree $\#(G)$ extension. (See EG Milne Corollary 2.14 and Theorem 3.4.)

The Artin-Schreier theorem says that $K/F$ is a finite degree extension and $K$ is algebraically closed, and $[K:F] \leq 2$.

Combining the two statements, if $G$ is a finite subgroup of $\text{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$, then $\#(G) \leq 2$.

There is no use of choice in the proof of either of the big tools that I'm using.

No, you shouldn't need any choice for this, and it should still be true if you replace $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$ with any other algebraic closure of $\mathbb{Q}$. Let $K$ be a field (which in our application will be $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$) and let $G$ be a finite group of automorphisms of $K$. Then $K/K^G$ is always a degree $\#(G)$ extension. (See EG Milne Corollary 2.14 and Theorem 3.4.)

The Artin-Schreier theorem says that $K/F$ is a finite degree extension and $K$ is algebraically closed, then $[K:F] \leq 2$.

Combining the two statements, if $G$ is a finite subgroup of $\text{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$, then $\#(G) \leq 2$.

There is no use of choice in the proof of either of the big tools that I'm using.

Source Link
David E Speyer
  • 156.2k
  • 14
  • 420
  • 763

No, you shouldn't need any choice for this, and it should still be true if you replace $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$ with any other algebraic closure of $\mathbb{Q}$. Let $K$ be a field (which in our application will be $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$) and let $G$ be a finite group of automorphisms of $K$. Then $K/K^G$ is always a degree $\#(G)$ extension. (See EG Milne Corollary 2.14 and Theorem 3.4.)

The Artin-Schreier theorem says that $K/F$ is a finite degree extension and $K$ is algebraically closed, and $[K:F] \leq 2$.

Combining the two statements, if $G$ is a finite subgroup of $\text{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$, then $\#(G) \leq 2$.

There is no use of choice in the proof of either of the big tools that I'm using.