Timeline for Why is every factor a tensor product of a $\sigma$-finite factor and a factor of type I?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 14, 2012 at 4:54 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Kevin Ventullo | ||
Nov 7, 2010 at 8:30 | comment | added | Kevin Ventullo | @Mariano: Ok, I will do that in the future. | |
Nov 7, 2010 at 8:28 | vote | accept | Kevin Ventullo | ||
Nov 6, 2010 at 16:29 | comment | added | Mariano Suárez-Álvarez | @Kevin: it is usually nicer to include the complete question in the body of the question, repeating the title in your case. | |
Nov 6, 2010 at 16:12 | answer | added | Martin Argerami | timeline score: 7 | |
Nov 6, 2010 at 14:40 | history | edited | Dmitri Pavlov |
edited tags
|
|
Nov 6, 2010 at 9:32 | answer | added | Makoto Yamashita | timeline score: 15 | |
Nov 6, 2010 at 8:44 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Sorry, I meant trivial centre! and my previous remark was wrong-headed, please ignore. | |
Nov 6, 2010 at 7:37 | comment | added | Kevin Ventullo | For me, a factor is a von Neumann algebra with trivial center. | |
Nov 6, 2010 at 6:43 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | If the definition of "factor" is "von Neumann algebra with trivial commutant" then I am rather puzzled by the claimed result (but I don't have access to a copy of Takesaki vol. 2 at present to check) | |
Nov 6, 2010 at 6:19 | history | edited | Kevin Ventullo | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Added page numbers; deleted 6 characters in body
|
Nov 6, 2010 at 5:56 | answer | added | Paul Z | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 6, 2010 at 2:13 | history | asked | Kevin Ventullo | CC BY-SA 2.5 |