Timeline for Upper bounds for the spatial differential of the inverse of a flux
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23 at 14:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 26 at 13:08 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Mar 28 at 13:06 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 29, 2023 at 12:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 1, 2023 at 11:06 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 2, 2023 at 9:20 | answer | added | tommy1996q | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 30, 2023 at 18:20 | comment | added | tommy1996q | Just an idea: a way to look at it is that the operator norm of $A^{-1}$ is equal to the reciprocal of the smallest singular value of $A$. Since the flow changes volumes in a controlled way, the smallest singular value of $A=\nabla _x X$ cannot be "too small", or in the other directions you couldn't stretch enough to have an admissible volume. | |
| Jun 30, 2023 at 16:04 | history | edited | tommy1996q | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 283 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2023 at 15:54 | history | asked | tommy1996q | CC BY-SA 4.0 |