Timeline for Is Heegaard-Floer homology the Lagrangian Floer homology of $M=\text{Sym}^g(\Sigma), L_0=\mathbb{T}_{\alpha},L_1=\mathbb{T}_{\beta}$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2023 at 21:30 | comment | added | Tom Hockenhull | After base-point considerations as Ian says, I think work of Perutz shows that you can choose all the auxiliary data you need (symplectic forms, etc.) so that HF^ agrees with HF. | |
| Jun 27, 2023 at 5:55 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting, added tag
|
| Jun 27, 2023 at 4:17 | comment | added | Ian Agol | It’s not quite that straightforward, you need to remove a base point in the complement of the Heegaard curves that the pseudoholomorphic disks can’t go through. | |
| Jun 27, 2023 at 2:20 | history | edited | contingent | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| S Jun 26, 2023 at 22:51 | review | First questions | |||
| Jun 27, 2023 at 1:36 | |||||
| S Jun 26, 2023 at 22:51 | history | asked | contingent | CC BY-SA 4.0 |