Timeline for Most memorable titles
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 12, 2020 at 19:10 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
minor typos
|
Nov 8, 2010 at 1:11 | history | edited | Gil Kalai | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body
|
Nov 5, 2010 at 18:25 | comment | added | Arend Bayer | I would put it more strongly: if you are in the position that the community won't mind your papers having catchy titles, then you probably aren't reading MO to get advice. | |
Nov 5, 2010 at 16:51 | comment | added | Suvrit | I think given the papers that I have seen being cited here, a conservative moral might be: the more powerful the content (or the writer) of the paper, the bolder the title one may select. More important to me is to figure out a good balance between catchyness, precision, and informativeness. I would not want to sacrifice the latter two in favor of the first one, unless I had a breakthrough result. | |
Nov 5, 2010 at 16:21 | history | answered | Gil Kalai | CC BY-SA 2.5 |