Timeline for Questions about proof that all indecomposable module categories over $\operatorname{Rep}(G)$ are equivalent to $\operatorname{Rep}^1(H,\omega)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 20, 2023 at 16:05 | comment | added | Sean Sanford | This might not be as satisfying, but it is easier to show that indecomposable module categories for $\text{Vec}_G$ are classified by such pairs $(H,\omega)$. From there you can tensor with the invertible $\big(\text{Rep}(G),\text{Vec}_G\big)$-bimodule category $\text{Vec}$ (invertible=Morita equivalence) to find that all indecomposable module categories for $\text{Rep}(G)$ are classified by the same pairs. This is a more modern way of arriving at this classification, but it's certainly less explicit. | |
Jun 23, 2023 at 20:33 | comment | added | shin chan | @LSpice Elements $\omega\in H^2(H,k^*)$ are one-to-one with central extensions $1\to k^*\to \tilde H\to H\to1$. With $\operatorname{Rep}^1(H,\omega)=\operatorname{Rep}(\tilde H)$ we denote representations of $\tilde H$ such that $k^*$ acts by the trivial character. | |
Jun 23, 2023 at 19:53 | comment | added | LSpice | What is $\tilde H$? | |
Jun 23, 2023 at 19:46 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Name of article; `\mathrm` -> `\operatorname`
|
Jun 23, 2023 at 17:57 | history | asked | shin chan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |