Timeline for Betti number and harmonic forms
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 19, 2020 at 18:22 | history | suggested | sz3 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
corrected spelling; "boundless" should be "boundaryless"
|
| Apr 19, 2020 at 17:50 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 19, 2020 at 18:22 | |||||
| S Oct 12, 2017 at 5:29 | history | suggested | kjetil b halvorsen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed unnecessary thanks
|
| Oct 12, 2017 at 2:56 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 12, 2017 at 5:29 | |||||
| Nov 5, 2010 at 21:02 | vote | accept | Bin Cheng | ||
| Nov 5, 2010 at 12:25 | comment | added | Donu Arapura | Some geometric and topological ideas are needed to set things up (e.g de Rham's theorem), but the bulk of the argument is PDE as has been pointed out already. Perhaps the proof in Wells' Differential Analysis on Complex Manifolds, which uses pseudodifferential operators and applies to elliptic complexes, might be to your taste. | |
| Nov 5, 2010 at 11:43 | answer | added | Johannes Ebert | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 5, 2010 at 9:31 | answer | added | Gunnar Þór Magnússon | timeline score: 11 | |
| Nov 5, 2010 at 2:09 | answer | added | Paul | timeline score: 14 | |
| Nov 5, 2010 at 0:34 | history | asked | Bin Cheng | CC BY-SA 2.5 |