Timeline for A generalisation of induced representations
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2023 at 14:00 | history | edited | Kenta Suzuki | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 299 characters in body
|
| Jun 14, 2023 at 8:37 | comment | added | Dror Speiser | I'm sure you know this, the third example isn't that much different, as changing the variety to GLn/B and the multiplicative group to $\mathbb{F}^\times _q {}^n$ gives a case of the first example | |
| Jun 14, 2023 at 2:43 | history | edited | Kenta Suzuki | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Jun 14, 2023 at 2:42 | comment | added | Kenta Suzuki | Sorry, there was a typo: $G\times H$ acts on $G$ by $(g,h)\cdot x:=gxh^{-1}$. This naturally extends to a $G\times H$-action on $\mathbb C[G]$. | |
| Jun 14, 2023 at 2:12 | comment | added | semisimpleton | Sorry, in the first example, could you explicitly describe the action by $G\times H$ on $\mathbb{C}[G]$? Did you perhaps mean to say: for $x\in\mathbb{C}[G]$, the action is given by $x\cdot (g,h) = (x\cdot g)\cdot h$? But this doesn't define an action... | |
| Jun 14, 2023 at 0:30 | history | answered | Kenta Suzuki | CC BY-SA 4.0 |