Timeline for Infinite Steiner systems
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 12, 2023 at 20:46 | comment | added | Joseph Van Name | I think the case where we are working with just the order type we won't have any Steiner systems for infinite $\kappa$. | |
Jun 12, 2023 at 20:34 | history | edited | Dominic van der Zypen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
Jun 12, 2023 at 20:34 | comment | added | Joseph Van Name | To make the question more interesting and non-trivial yet still a generalization of the finite case, instead of requiring for $|A|=\lambda$ for $A\in S$, we can instead require that that if $B$ has order type $\kappa$ instead of simply cardinality $\kappa$. And here, we can let $\kappa$ be just an ordinal instead of a cardinal (I did not think about this too much, so maybe it has a simple solution in this case too). | |
Jun 12, 2023 at 20:13 | comment | added | Joseph Van Name | Suppose $\kappa$ is infinite. Then let $L:P_\kappa(\lambda)\rightarrow S$ be the unique function with $B\subseteq L(B)$ for $B\in P_\kappa(\lambda)$. Then if $A\subseteq B$, then since $A\subseteq B\subseteq L(B)$ we know that $L(A)=L(B)$ whenever $A\subseteq B$. In particular, if $A,B\in P_\kappa(\lambda)$, then $L(A)=L(A\cup B)=L(B)$ which contradicts (1). There is a reason we don't hear about infinite Steiner systems. The case where $\kappa$ is finite should follow from the Löwenheim–Skolem theorem. | |
Jun 12, 2023 at 19:49 | comment | added | Noah Schweber | Should "$A\subseteq B$" be "$A\supseteq B$" in your last bulletpoint? | |
Jun 12, 2023 at 19:40 | history | asked | Dominic van der Zypen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |