Skip to main content
Post Undeleted by Duality
Post Deleted by Duality
formatting
Link
YCor
  • 63.9k
  • 5
  • 187
  • 286

Norm map of Tate-Shafarevich group $Sha$\mathrm{Sha}(E/K)\to Sha\mathrm{Sha}(E/\Bbb{Q})$

added 33 characters in body
Source Link
Duality
  • 1.5k
  • 7
  • 13

Let $K$ be a quadratic number field. Let $\sigma$ be a generator of Galois group of $K/\Bbb{Q}$. Let $E$ be an elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$.

Let $\mathrm{Sha}(E/K)$ denote the Tate-Shafarevich group of $E/K$. Can we explicitly write down the norm map of the Tate-Shafarevich group $\mathrm{Sha}(E/K) \to \mathrm{Sha}(E/\mathbb{Q})$?

(Reference: What's the Hilbert class field of an elliptic curve?)

At first, I thought that the map $[C] \mapsto [C] + [C]^{\sigma}$ would provide the desired map. However, it does not commute with the Galois action, meaning that $([C] + [D])^{\sigma} \neq [C]^{\sigma} + [D]^{\sigma}$$([C] + [C]^{\sigma} )^{\sigma} \neq [C]^{\sigma} + [C]$ in general, thus this is not well-defined.

Thank you for your help.

Let $K$ be a quadratic number field. Let $E$ be an elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$.

Let $\mathrm{Sha}(E/K)$ denote the Tate-Shafarevich group of $E/K$. Can we explicitly write down the norm map of the Tate-Shafarevich group $\mathrm{Sha}(E/K) \to \mathrm{Sha}(E/\mathbb{Q})$?

(Reference: What's the Hilbert class field of an elliptic curve?)

At first, I thought that the map $[C] \mapsto [C] + [C]^{\sigma}$ would provide the desired map. However, it does not commute with the Galois action, meaning that $([C] + [D])^{\sigma} \neq [C]^{\sigma} + [D]^{\sigma}$ in general.

Thank you for your help.

Let $K$ be a quadratic number field. Let $\sigma$ be a generator of Galois group of $K/\Bbb{Q}$. Let $E$ be an elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$.

Let $\mathrm{Sha}(E/K)$ denote the Tate-Shafarevich group of $E/K$. Can we explicitly write down the norm map of the Tate-Shafarevich group $\mathrm{Sha}(E/K) \to \mathrm{Sha}(E/\mathbb{Q})$?

(Reference: What's the Hilbert class field of an elliptic curve?)

At first, I thought that the map $[C] \mapsto [C] + [C]^{\sigma}$ would provide the desired map. However, it does not commute with the Galois action, meaning that $([C] + [C]^{\sigma} )^{\sigma} \neq [C]^{\sigma} + [C]$ in general, thus this is not well-defined.

Thank you for your help.

added 87 characters in body
Source Link
Duality
  • 1.5k
  • 7
  • 13

Let $K$ be a quadratic number field.Let Let $E$ be an elliptic curve defined over $\Bbb{Q}$$\mathbb{Q}$.

$Sha(E/K)$ be Let $\mathrm{Sha}(E/K)$ denote the Tate-Shafarevich group of $E/K$. Can Can we explicitly write down the norm map of the Tate-Shafarevich group $Sha(E/K)\to Sha(E/\Bbb{Q})$ $\mathrm{Sha}(E/K) \to \mathrm{Sha}(E/\mathbb{Q})$?

(cf.Reference: What's the Hilbert class field of an elliptic curve?)

IAt first, I thought that the map $[C]\to [C]+[C]^{\sigma}$ gives$[C] \mapsto [C] + [C]^{\sigma}$ would provide the desired map. But However, it does not commute with the Galois action, meaning that is, $([C]+[D])^{\sigma}=[C]^{\sigma}+[D]^{\sigma}$ does not hold$([C] + [D])^{\sigma} \neq [C]^{\sigma} + [D]^{\sigma}$ in general.

Thank you for your help.

Let $K$ be a quadratic number field.Let $E$ be an elliptic curve defined over $\Bbb{Q}$.

$Sha(E/K)$ be Tate-Shafarevich group of $E/K$. Can we explicitly write down norm map of Tate-Shafarevich group $Sha(E/K)\to Sha(E/\Bbb{Q})$ ?

(cf. What's the Hilbert class field of an elliptic curve?)

I first thought that the map $[C]\to [C]+[C]^{\sigma}$ gives the map. But it does not commute with Galois action, that is, $([C]+[D])^{\sigma}=[C]^{\sigma}+[D]^{\sigma}$ does not hold in general.

Thank you for your help.

Let $K$ be a quadratic number field. Let $E$ be an elliptic curve defined over $\mathbb{Q}$.

Let $\mathrm{Sha}(E/K)$ denote the Tate-Shafarevich group of $E/K$. Can we explicitly write down the norm map of the Tate-Shafarevich group $\mathrm{Sha}(E/K) \to \mathrm{Sha}(E/\mathbb{Q})$?

(Reference: What's the Hilbert class field of an elliptic curve?)

At first, I thought that the map $[C] \mapsto [C] + [C]^{\sigma}$ would provide the desired map. However, it does not commute with the Galois action, meaning that $([C] + [D])^{\sigma} \neq [C]^{\sigma} + [D]^{\sigma}$ in general.

Thank you for your help.

Source Link
Duality
  • 1.5k
  • 7
  • 13
Loading