Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 3, 2015 at 23:42 history edited GH from MO
edited tags
Mar 14, 2011 at 11:33 answer added Chandan Singh Dalawat timeline score: 9
Nov 4, 2010 at 13:14 vote accept Olivier
Nov 4, 2010 at 12:22 answer added David E Speyer timeline score: 24
Nov 4, 2010 at 11:23 answer added Robin Chapman timeline score: 20
Nov 4, 2010 at 11:08 answer added Kevin Buzzard timeline score: 13
Nov 4, 2010 at 11:04 comment added Kevin Buzzard You'll need the base to contain $Q(\zeta_5)$ or something, to stop it being ramified at 5.
Nov 4, 2010 at 11:00 comment added François Brunault I don't know whether this is relevant here, but since $A_5$ is isomorphic to $\mathrm{PSL}_2(\mathbf{F}_5)$, one could try to start with an elliptic curve over some number field with good reduction everywhere, and look at the Galois representation on the 5-torsion points.
Nov 4, 2010 at 10:50 comment added Kevin Buzzard The problem with using Hilbert modular forms is that it is very common that the associated mod $p$ representation is ramified at $p$, making the problem computationally very hard. For example if you want to compute in parallel weight 2 then even the determinant of the mod $p$ representation will be ramified at $p$ unless $p=2$. This rules out using, say, standard tables of elliptic curves of conductor 1.
Nov 4, 2010 at 10:47 comment added Kevin Buzzard I've forgotten the standard example, but I think there's a standard example. You write down some explicit polynomial of degree 5 with rational coefficients (it's something like $x^5+x+1$ but it's not exactly that) and its Galois group over $\mathbf{Q}$ is $S_5$, and then you let the base be the quadratic subextension.
Nov 4, 2010 at 10:33 history asked Olivier CC BY-SA 2.5