Timeline for near ergodic theory question
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 26, 2023 at 7:14 | comment | added | Augusto Santos | @OlegZubelewicz: It is Ok. | |
May 25, 2023 at 19:12 | vote | accept | Oleg Zubelewicz | ||
May 25, 2023 at 19:12 | comment | added | Oleg Zubelewicz | Thanks, I asked a stupid question | |
May 25, 2023 at 19:00 | comment | added | Augusto Santos | @OlegZubelewicz: I am not sure I understand your latter comment, but I updated the answer to render this step clearer. | |
May 25, 2023 at 19:00 | history | edited | Augusto Santos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 290 characters in body
|
May 25, 2023 at 18:43 | comment | added | Oleg Zubelewicz | $A_kf:=\frac{1}{k}\sum_{j=0}^{k-1}fT^j;\quad A_k(fT)=A_kf-f/k+\frac{1}{k}fT^k$ | |
May 25, 2023 at 18:29 | comment | added | Augusto Santos | @OlegZubelewicz: You are missing that $g_{0}= \limsup_{k\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{k} \sum_{i=0}^{k-1} fT^{i}= \limsup_{k\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{k} \sum_{i=0}^{\ell-1} fT^{i}+\limsup_{k\rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{k} \sum_{i=\ell}^{k-1} fT^{i}$. Since the first term is zero (regardless of whether $f\in L^{\infty}$ or not, since it is a finite sum of finite elements) and the second is $g_{\ell}$, you have that $g_0=g_{\ell}$, for any $\ell \in \mathbb{N}$. | |
May 25, 2023 at 18:16 | comment | added | Oleg Zubelewicz | Yes, and it remains to show that $g_1=g_0$. I understand that just for $f\in L^\infty$ | |
May 25, 2023 at 17:35 | history | answered | Augusto Santos | CC BY-SA 4.0 |