Timeline for The condition for mutually orthogonal Latin square
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2023 at 15:00 | comment | added | Willie Wong | Please edit the clarification into the original question (it makes it more visible, and save readers the time of having to go through the comments). | |
| May 23, 2023 at 2:02 | comment | added | Lim do | Yes. A and B should have same first row. (Both original question and converse) | |
| May 21, 2023 at 17:52 | comment | added | 1001 | Do you also require the fixed first row property for the original question? | |
| May 21, 2023 at 4:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 2, 2023 at 3:02 | |||||
| May 21, 2023 at 2:33 | comment | added | Lim do | I forgot to mention this. They are Mutually orthogonal latin squares of order n and their first row is fixed by (1,2,...,n). Then I think converse is true. | |
| May 20, 2023 at 19:46 | comment | added | 1001 | What do you mean by the converse and by mutual orthogonality? There is an example on Wikipedia of mutually orthogonal Latin squares of order 3, and the first columns are identical: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutually_orthogonal_Latin_squares | |
| May 20, 2023 at 17:55 | history | edited | Rodrigo de Azevedo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 15 characters in body
|
| S May 20, 2023 at 17:38 | review | First questions | |||
| May 21, 2023 at 4:39 | |||||
| S May 20, 2023 at 17:38 | history | asked | Lim do | CC BY-SA 4.0 |