Skip to main content

Timeline for An application of ping-pong lemma

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 16, 2023 at 15:34 comment added Carl-Fredrik Nyberg Brodda I really like how many different (yet, under the hood, the same!) answers this question attracts. It showcases just how beautiful even the most basic objects of combinatorial/geometric group theory are; so imagine how beautiful the rest of it is! :-)
May 16, 2023 at 15:00 answer added Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine timeline score: 3
May 16, 2023 at 14:16 answer added Peter LeFanu Lumsdaine timeline score: 7
May 16, 2023 at 9:56 answer added YCor timeline score: 7
May 16, 2023 at 8:22 history edited HJRW
edited tags
May 15, 2023 at 21:29 answer added Luc Guyot timeline score: 4
May 15, 2023 at 14:43 history became hot network question
May 15, 2023 at 13:10 answer added Benjamin Steinberg timeline score: 5
May 15, 2023 at 8:31 answer added Sam Nead timeline score: 7
May 15, 2023 at 8:02 comment added HJRW The easiest and most illuminating way to prove this is to draw the Stallings core graph for the subgroup $H$. If you're determined to use ping pong, you should think about the complementary components of the geodesic $[1,b^{d-1}]$ in the Cayley tree.
May 15, 2023 at 7:08 comment added YCor In any case it is true. If $A,B$ are groups, then in $A\ast B$, the subgroups $aBa^{-1}$ for $a\in A$ generate their free product. The proof is quite immediate: consider the semidirect product $B^{\ast A}\rtimes A$ ($A$ acting by shift) and map $A\ast B$ to it in the obvious way.
May 15, 2023 at 7:06 comment added YCor Why don't you simply write $H=\langle b^{-k}ab^k,\; k=0,\dots,d-1\rangle$?
May 15, 2023 at 6:38 history asked Shiv Parsad CC BY-SA 4.0