Timeline for What is the ring structure on Lusztig's integral form of quantum $\mathfrak{sl}(2)$?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2023 at 22:24 | vote | accept | Alvaro Martinez | ||
| May 15, 2023 at 18:54 | answer | added | Alvaro Martinez | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 14, 2023 at 23:21 | history | edited | Alvaro Martinez | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added edit regarding linear independence of Lusztig’s elements
|
| May 14, 2023 at 15:49 | history | edited | Alvaro Martinez | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Clarified integrality condition
|
| May 14, 2023 at 6:37 | history | edited | Alvaro Martinez | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Clearer definition
|
| May 13, 2023 at 14:42 | history | edited | Alvaro Martinez | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Title a bit more precise
|
| May 13, 2023 at 5:27 | history | edited | Alvaro Martinez | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added exponent t
|
| May 13, 2023 at 5:19 | comment | added | Alvaro Martinez | @LSpice Good to know! Thanks for the edits | |
| May 13, 2023 at 4:18 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Oops, missed a period
|
| May 13, 2023 at 4:16 | comment | added | LSpice |
Please don't use displaymath in titles. TeX note: The ferociously general command \genfrac is meant for situations like yours. For example, $\genfrac()0{}{H + c}t$ \genfrac()0{}{H + c}t produces the un-quantised version, $\genfrac[]0{}{K; c}t$ \genfrac[]0{}{K; c}t produces the quantised version, and, just to illustrate, $\genfrac(){}{}a q$ is a Legendre symbol \genfrac(){}{}a q. I always have to Google the syntax, but the first two arguments are the delimiters, and the last two are the "numerator" and "denominator" of a generalised fraction. Anyway, I edited accordingly.
|
|
| May 13, 2023 at 4:11 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
De-display title; name of paper; DOI'd link; `\genfrac`
|
| May 13, 2023 at 3:57 | comment | added | Alvaro Martinez | @WillSawin thanks! fixed now | |
| May 13, 2023 at 3:57 | history | edited | Alvaro Martinez | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added c to the RHS of the definition
|
| May 13, 2023 at 3:39 | comment | added | Will Sawin | Should there be a $c$ in the right side of your definition? | |
| May 13, 2023 at 1:35 | history | asked | Alvaro Martinez | CC BY-SA 4.0 |