Timeline for Manifold of entangled states
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2023 at 10:28 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | no, there exist more general entanglement-preserving channels, I added a reference. | |
| May 12, 2023 at 10:28 | history | edited | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 146 characters in body
|
| May 12, 2023 at 10:25 | comment | added | Fabio | Thank you, the answer is simpler then what I thught then. Is this true even in the case of multipartite entanglement? So a entanglement preserving channel/operator can be always written as a convex combination of local unitaries (possibly random). | |
| May 12, 2023 at 10:20 | comment | added | Carlo Beenakker | not with local unitary operations; these just amount to a change of basis, any meaningful measure of entanglement should be basis independent. | |
| May 12, 2023 at 10:20 | comment | added | Fabio | That's what I thought, but it seems not true. Meaning that given a separable state you cannot entangle it using local operations but given an entangled state you can destroy or decrease its entanglement with local operations. | |
| May 12, 2023 at 10:11 | history | answered | Carlo Beenakker | CC BY-SA 4.0 |