Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by Chen Zeno
Bounty Ended with user42355's answer chosen by Chen Zeno
Notice added Draw attention by Chen Zeno
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Chen Zeno
added 405 characters in body
Source Link
Chen Zeno
  • 115
  • 1
  • 10

Setting:

Suppose
Suppose $\{u_i\}_{i=1}^n \subset R^d$ is a collection of unit vectors such that $u_i^Tu_j < 0$ for all $i\neq j$, and $w$ is a unit vector such that $u_i^T w> 0$ for all $i=1,\dotsc,n$. Let $a \in R^d$ be a unit vector.

Goal:

We
We want to show that the following hold or to find a counter-example.

$$\sum_{i=1}^n \lvert u_i^T a\rvert u_i^T w < 1$$

We can prove this statement for the case of $n=2$, but we were not able to prove it for $n>2$.

Any suggestions?

Update:
We used Echo's approach from the comment. It worked for the first iteration (when the local maximum is an interior point) from the stationarity condition of the gradient. However, we got stuck at the second iteration (when one of the constraints was active). So now we have a stationarity condition on the projected gradient. We couldn't solve this. Any help would be appreciated.

Setting:

Suppose $\{u_i\}_{i=1}^n \subset R^d$ is a collection of unit vectors such that $u_i^Tu_j < 0$ for all $i\neq j$, and $w$ is a unit vector such that $u_i^T w> 0$ for all $i=1,\dotsc,n$. Let $a \in R^d$ be a unit vector.

Goal:

We want to show that the following hold or to find a counter-example.

$$\sum_{i=1}^n \lvert u_i^T a\rvert u_i^T w < 1$$

We can prove this statement for the case of $n=2$, but we were not able to prove it for $n>2$.

Any suggestions?

Setting:
Suppose $\{u_i\}_{i=1}^n \subset R^d$ is a collection of unit vectors such that $u_i^Tu_j < 0$ for all $i\neq j$, and $w$ is a unit vector such that $u_i^T w> 0$ for all $i=1,\dotsc,n$. Let $a \in R^d$ be a unit vector.

Goal:
We want to show that the following hold or to find a counter-example.

$$\sum_{i=1}^n \lvert u_i^T a\rvert u_i^T w < 1$$

We can prove this statement for the case of $n=2$, but we were not able to prove it for $n>2$.

Any suggestions?

Update:
We used Echo's approach from the comment. It worked for the first iteration (when the local maximum is an interior point) from the stationarity condition of the gradient. However, we got stuck at the second iteration (when one of the constraints was active). So now we have a stationarity condition on the projected gradient. We couldn't solve this. Any help would be appreciated.

deleted 1 character in body
Source Link
Chen Zeno
  • 115
  • 1
  • 10

Setting:

Suppose $\{u_i\}_{i=1}^n \subset R^d$ is a collection of unit vectors such that $u_i^Tu_j < 0$ for all $i\neq j$, and $w$ is a unit vector such that $u_i^T w> 0$ for all $i=1,\dotsc,n$. Let $a \in R^d$ be a unit vector.

Goal:

We want to show that the following hold or to find a counter-example.

$$\sum_{i=1}^n \lvert u_i^T a\rvert u_i^T w < 1.$$$$\sum_{i=1}^n \lvert u_i^T a\rvert u_i^T w < 1$$

We can prove this statement for the case of $n=2$, but we were not able to prove it for $n>2$.

Any suggestions?

Setting:

Suppose $\{u_i\}_{i=1}^n \subset R^d$ is a collection of unit vectors such that $u_i^Tu_j < 0$ for all $i\neq j$, and $w$ is a unit vector such that $u_i^T w> 0$ for all $i=1,\dotsc,n$. Let $a \in R^d$ be a unit vector.

Goal:

We want to show that the following hold or to find a counter-example.

$$\sum_{i=1}^n \lvert u_i^T a\rvert u_i^T w < 1.$$

We can prove this statement for the case of $n=2$, but we were not able to prove it for $n>2$.

Any suggestions?

Setting:

Suppose $\{u_i\}_{i=1}^n \subset R^d$ is a collection of unit vectors such that $u_i^Tu_j < 0$ for all $i\neq j$, and $w$ is a unit vector such that $u_i^T w> 0$ for all $i=1,\dotsc,n$. Let $a \in R^d$ be a unit vector.

Goal:

We want to show that the following hold or to find a counter-example.

$$\sum_{i=1}^n \lvert u_i^T a\rvert u_i^T w < 1$$

We can prove this statement for the case of $n=2$, but we were not able to prove it for $n>2$.

Any suggestions?

TeX
Source Link
LSpice
  • 12.9k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 69

Setting:

Suppose $\{u_i\}_{i=1}^n \subset R^d$ is a collection of unit vectors such that $u_i^Tu_j < 0$ for all $i\neq j$, and $w$ is a unit vector such that $u_i^T w> 0$ for all $i=1,...,n$$i=1,\dotsc,n$. Let $a \in R^d$ be a unit vector.

Goal:

We want to show that the following hold or to find a counter-example.

$\sum_{i=1}^n |u_i^T a| u_i^T w < 1$.$$\sum_{i=1}^n \lvert u_i^T a\rvert u_i^T w < 1.$$

We can prove this statement for the case of n=2$n=2$, but we were not able to prove it for n>2$n>2$.

Any suggestions?

Setting:

Suppose $\{u_i\}_{i=1}^n \subset R^d$ is a collection of unit vectors such that $u_i^Tu_j < 0$ for all $i\neq j$, and $w$ is a unit vector such that $u_i^T w> 0$ for all $i=1,...,n$. Let $a \in R^d$ be a unit vector.

Goal:

We want to show that the following hold or to find a counter-example.

$\sum_{i=1}^n |u_i^T a| u_i^T w < 1$.

We can prove this statement for the case of n=2, but we were not able to prove it for n>2.

Any suggestions?

Setting:

Suppose $\{u_i\}_{i=1}^n \subset R^d$ is a collection of unit vectors such that $u_i^Tu_j < 0$ for all $i\neq j$, and $w$ is a unit vector such that $u_i^T w> 0$ for all $i=1,\dotsc,n$. Let $a \in R^d$ be a unit vector.

Goal:

We want to show that the following hold or to find a counter-example.

$$\sum_{i=1}^n \lvert u_i^T a\rvert u_i^T w < 1.$$

We can prove this statement for the case of $n=2$, but we were not able to prove it for $n>2$.

Any suggestions?

deleted 4 characters in body
Source Link
Chen Zeno
  • 115
  • 1
  • 10
Loading
Source Link
Chen Zeno
  • 115
  • 1
  • 10
Loading