Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 3, 2023 at 9:13 comment added varkor Wood defines pointwise extensions in Abstract pro arrows I, as limits weighted by corepresentable distributors. If you look at the definition, it essentially coincides with the classical definition of pointwise right extension, e.g. here.
May 3, 2023 at 8:37 comment added nicolas With the corrected definition of weighted limits I don't see how a pointwise kan extension is one.. I will post a new question
May 3, 2023 at 6:57 vote accept nicolas
May 3, 2023 at 6:28 answer added varkor timeline score: 2
May 3, 2023 at 5:32 history edited nicolas CC BY-SA 4.0
added 49 characters in body
May 3, 2023 at 5:09 history edited nicolas CC BY-SA 4.0
added 49 characters in body
May 2, 2023 at 15:01 comment added nicolas (any limit weighted by $P$ has the property that evaluating it at a specific functor $b:X\to B$ is the limit weighted by $\phi^b \otimes P$. we get the limit formula when we choose a functor from $X=1$, to which pointwise extension also evaluate to)
May 2, 2023 at 14:57 history edited nicolas CC BY-SA 4.0
added 10 characters in body
May 2, 2023 at 14:56 comment added nicolas as far as a I understand, a pointwise kan extension is a weighted limit (a specific one, weighted by $\phi_j$). what I am trying to understand is the difference between weighted limits and (representation of) Kan extension in $Dist$, the bicategory of distributors.
May 2, 2023 at 14:53 comment added varkor A pointwise right extension along $j \colon A \to B$ in $\mathrm{Cat}$ is precisely a limit weighted by the corepresentable $B(1, j)$, hence a right extension along $B(1, j)$ in $\mathrm{Dist}$. Is this what you are asking?
May 2, 2023 at 14:44 history edited nicolas CC BY-SA 4.0
added 10 characters in body
May 2, 2023 at 14:38 history asked nicolas CC BY-SA 4.0