Timeline for How to restore the original formula from a binomial-like expansion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Oct 28, 2013 at 11:26 | history | edited | user9072 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
OEIS linnk fixed.
|
| S Oct 28, 2013 at 11:26 | history | suggested | Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
OEIS linnk fixed.
|
| Oct 28, 2013 at 11:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Oct 28, 2013 at 11:26 | |||||
| Nov 3, 2010 at 0:05 | comment | added | Anixx | And it turned out that the A(a,b) are just Bell's numbers of b-th order. So now only the algebraic part of the question remains: how to reverse the binomial expansion in this case? | |
| Nov 2, 2010 at 21:52 | comment | added | Anixx | Indeed. But there are some issues. - I need to compute it with x real - I wanted to have a smaller formula for such binomial expression. So the main question remains in force: is it possible to write binomial-like expression as $A(n−1,x∗k)$ where * is some function of two variables? | |
| Nov 2, 2010 at 13:26 | history | answered | JBL | CC BY-SA 2.5 |