Timeline for Can all n-manifolds be obtained by gluing finitely many blocks?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| S Mar 11, 2017 at 23:42 | history | suggested | Jeppe Stig Nielsen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
make other question mentioned into an actual link
|
| Mar 11, 2017 at 23:31 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 11, 2017 at 23:42 | |||||
| Nov 11, 2010 at 21:29 | comment | added | Kim Morrison | c.f. Michael's second answer below, with the link to the arXiv paper. | |
| Nov 6, 2010 at 15:38 | comment | added | Bruno Martelli | Thank you, I would be very much interested in seeing these notes. As far as I understand, the question remains open if restricted to simply connected closed 4-manifolds. | |
| Nov 4, 2010 at 8:46 | vote | accept | Bruno Martelli | ||
| Nov 2, 2010 at 19:37 | history | edited | Ian Agol | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 48 characters in body
|
| Nov 2, 2010 at 1:58 | comment | added | Will Jagy | That being said, MO does accept Latex in answer windows, there are just a few tricks such as triple backslashes in matrices. So if it is really short, you can paste in the code, or email the .tex file to Ian or me and we will figure it out. | |
| Nov 2, 2010 at 1:48 | comment | added | Will Jagy | If you put the teXed notes on any website and indicate enough of how we could find that, somebody (me for example) could edit your post by making a genuine link to the pdf or postscipt file or what have you. The arXiv would be fine. | |
| Nov 2, 2010 at 1:05 | history | answered | michael freedman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |