Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Iosif Pinelis
  • 127.9k
  • 8
  • 107
  • 229

Take indeed any interval $J\in\J_\de$. Note that (i) $f(a)=0=f(b)$ and (ii) either $f>0$ on $(a,b)$ or $f<0$ on $(a,b)$. Wlog, $f>0$ (on $(a,b)$). Moreover, $f$ is continuous. So, $M:=f(x_*)\ge f(x)$ for some $x_*\in J$ and all $x\in J$. For any $c\in(0,M]$, the points \begin{equation*} x_+(c):=\min\{x\in[x_*,b)\colon f(x)\le c\},\quad x_-(c):=\max\{x\in(a,x_*]\colon f(x)\le c\}. \end{equation*}\begin{equation*} x_+(c):=\min\{x\in[x_*,b)\colon f(x)\le c\},\quad x_-(c):=\max\{x\in(a,x_*]\colon f(x)\le c\} \end{equation*} are well defined. Moreover,
\begin{equation*} f\ge c\text{ on }J_c:=[x_-(c),x_+(c)],\quad f(x_\pm(c))=c. \tag{40}\label{40} \end{equation*}

Take indeed any interval $J\in\J_\de$. Note that (i) $f(a)=0=f(b)$ and (ii) either $f>0$ on $(a,b)$ or $f<0$ on $(a,b)$. Wlog, $f>0$ (on $(a,b)$). Moreover, $f$ is continuous. So, $M:=f(x_*)\ge f(x)$ for some $x_*\in J$ and all $x\in J$. For any $c\in(0,M]$, the points \begin{equation*} x_+(c):=\min\{x\in[x_*,b)\colon f(x)\le c\},\quad x_-(c):=\max\{x\in(a,x_*]\colon f(x)\le c\}. \end{equation*} are well defined. Moreover,
\begin{equation*} f\ge c\text{ on }J_c:=[x_-(c),x_+(c)],\quad f(x_\pm(c))=c. \tag{40}\label{40} \end{equation*}

Take indeed any interval $J\in\J_\de$. Note that (i) $f(a)=0=f(b)$ and (ii) either $f>0$ on $(a,b)$ or $f<0$ on $(a,b)$. Wlog, $f>0$ (on $(a,b)$). Moreover, $f$ is continuous. So, $M:=f(x_*)\ge f(x)$ for some $x_*\in J$ and all $x\in J$. For any $c\in(0,M]$, the points \begin{equation*} x_+(c):=\min\{x\in[x_*,b)\colon f(x)\le c\},\quad x_-(c):=\max\{x\in(a,x_*]\colon f(x)\le c\} \end{equation*} are well defined. Moreover,
\begin{equation*} f\ge c\text{ on }J_c:=[x_-(c),x_+(c)],\quad f(x_\pm(c))=c. \tag{40}\label{40} \end{equation*}

added 84 characters in body
Source Link
Iosif Pinelis
  • 127.9k
  • 8
  • 107
  • 229

Take indeed any interval $J\in\J_\de$. Note that (i) $f(a)=0=f(b)$ and (ii) either $f>0$ on $(a,b)$ or $f<0$ on $(a,b)$. Wlog, $f>0$ (on $(a,b)$). Moreover, $f$ is continuous. So, $M:=f(x_*)\ge f(x)$ for some $x_*\in J$ and all $x\in J$. For any $c\in(0,M]$, the points \begin{equation*} x_+(c):=\min\{x\in[x_*,b)\colon f(x)\le c\},\quad x_-(c):=\max\{x\in(a,x_*]\colon f(x)\le c\}. \end{equation*} Thenare well defined. Moreover,
\begin{equation*} f\ge c\text{ on }J_c:=[x_-(c),x_+(c)],\quad f(x_\pm(c))=c. \tag{40}\label{40} \end{equation*}

Further, for $x\in[x_+(c),x_+(c)+\eta]$,
\begin{align} g_\eta(x)&=\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x-u)-c)1(x-u\in J_c) \notag \\ &=\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x-u)-f(x_+(c))1(x-u\in J_c) \notag \\ &\le\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(x_+(c)-(x-u))^\al 1(x-u\in [x_-(c),x_+(c)]) \notag \\ &\le\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)\eta^\al 1(x-u\in [x_-(c),x_+(c)]) \le\eta^\al. \notag \end{align} On the other hand, again for $x\in[x_+(c),x_+(c)+\eta]$, we have $f(x)\ge f(x_+(c))-(x-x_+(c))^\al\ge c-\eta^\al\ge\eta^\al\ge g_\eta(x)$ assuming that \begin{equation*} 2\eta^\al\le c, \tag{50}\label{50} \end{equation*} which will be indeed assumed henceforth. Similarly, $g_\eta(x)\le\eta^\al$ for $x\in[x_-(c)-\eta,x_-(c)]$ given \eqref{50}. Also, $g_\eta(x)=0\le f(x)$ for $x\in J\setminus J_c$. We conclude that \begin{equation} g_\eta\le f\text{ on }J. \end{equation}

By \eqref{45}, on $J_c$ the function $g$ is uniformly close to $f$ if $c$ is small enough, which will be henceforth assumed. 

Also, foron $x\in J\setminus J_c$$J\setminus J_c$ we have $0\le f\le\de^\al$$0\le f\le\max((b-x_+(c))^\al,(x_-(c)-a)^\al)$, which is small (since $\de$$c$ was assumed to be small), and hence $f$ is close to $g$ (which is $0$ on $J\setminus J_c$). So, $g$ is uniformly close to $f$ on $J$, uniformly in $J\in\J_\de$.

Take indeed any interval $J\in\J_\de$. Note that (i) $f(a)=0=f(b)$ and (ii) either $f>0$ on $(a,b)$ or $f<0$ on $(a,b)$. Wlog, $f>0$ (on $(a,b)$). Moreover, $f$ is continuous. So, $M:=f(x_*)\ge f(x)$ for some $x_*\in J$ and all $x\in J$. For any $c\in(0,M]$, the points \begin{equation*} x_+(c):=\min\{x\in[x_*,b)\colon f(x)\le c\},\quad x_-(c):=\max\{x\in(a,x_*]\colon f(x)\le c\}. \end{equation*} Then \begin{equation*} f\ge c\text{ on }J_c:=[x_-(c),x_+(c)],\quad f(x_\pm(c))=c. \tag{40}\label{40} \end{equation*}

Further, for $x\in[x_+(c),x_+(c)+\eta]$,
\begin{align} g_\eta(x)&=\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x-u)-c)1(x-u\in J_c) \notag \\ &=\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x-u)-f(x_+(c))1(x-u\in J_c) \notag \\ &\le\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(x_+(c)-(x-u))^\al 1(x-u\in [x_-(c),x_+(c)]) \notag \\ &\le\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)\eta^\al 1(x-u\in [x_-(c),x_+(c)]) \le\eta^\al. \notag \end{align} On the other hand, again for $x\in[x_+(c),x_+(c)+\eta]$, we have $f(x)\ge f(x_+(c))-(x-x_+(c))^\al\ge c-\eta^\al\ge\eta^\al\ge g_\eta(x)$ assuming that \begin{equation*} 2\eta^\al\le c, \tag{50}\label{50} \end{equation*} which will be indeed assumed henceforth. Similarly, $g_\eta(x)\le\eta^\al$ given \eqref{50}. Also, $g_\eta(x)=0\le f(x)$ for $x\in J\setminus J_c$. We conclude that \begin{equation} g_\eta\le f\text{ on }J. \end{equation}

By \eqref{45}, on $J_c$ the function $g$ is uniformly close to $f$ if $c$ is small enough, which will be henceforth assumed. Also, for $x\in J\setminus J_c$ we have $0\le f\le\de^\al$, which is small (since $\de$ was assumed to be small) and hence close to $g$ (which is $0$ on $J\setminus J_c$). So, $g$ is uniformly close to $f$ on $J$, uniformly in $J\in\J_\de$.

Take indeed any interval $J\in\J_\de$. Note that (i) $f(a)=0=f(b)$ and (ii) either $f>0$ on $(a,b)$ or $f<0$ on $(a,b)$. Wlog, $f>0$ (on $(a,b)$). Moreover, $f$ is continuous. So, $M:=f(x_*)\ge f(x)$ for some $x_*\in J$ and all $x\in J$. For any $c\in(0,M]$, the points \begin{equation*} x_+(c):=\min\{x\in[x_*,b)\colon f(x)\le c\},\quad x_-(c):=\max\{x\in(a,x_*]\colon f(x)\le c\}. \end{equation*} are well defined. Moreover,
\begin{equation*} f\ge c\text{ on }J_c:=[x_-(c),x_+(c)],\quad f(x_\pm(c))=c. \tag{40}\label{40} \end{equation*}

Further, for $x\in[x_+(c),x_+(c)+\eta]$,
\begin{align} g_\eta(x)&=\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x-u)-c)1(x-u\in J_c) \notag \\ &=\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x-u)-f(x_+(c))1(x-u\in J_c) \notag \\ &\le\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(x_+(c)-(x-u))^\al 1(x-u\in [x_-(c),x_+(c)]) \notag \\ &\le\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)\eta^\al 1(x-u\in [x_-(c),x_+(c)]) \le\eta^\al. \notag \end{align} On the other hand, again for $x\in[x_+(c),x_+(c)+\eta]$, we have $f(x)\ge f(x_+(c))-(x-x_+(c))^\al\ge c-\eta^\al\ge\eta^\al\ge g_\eta(x)$ assuming that \begin{equation*} 2\eta^\al\le c, \tag{50}\label{50} \end{equation*} which will be indeed assumed henceforth. Similarly, $g_\eta(x)\le\eta^\al$ for $x\in[x_-(c)-\eta,x_-(c)]$ given \eqref{50}. Also, $g_\eta(x)=0\le f(x)$ for $x\in J\setminus J_c$. We conclude that \begin{equation} g_\eta\le f\text{ on }J. \end{equation}

By \eqref{45}, on $J_c$ the function $g$ is uniformly close to $f$ if $c$ is small enough, which will be henceforth assumed. 

Also, on $J\setminus J_c$ we have $0\le f\le\max((b-x_+(c))^\al,(x_-(c)-a)^\al)$, which is small (since $c$ was assumed to be small), and hence $f$ is close to $g$ (which is $0$ on $J\setminus J_c$). So, $g$ is uniformly close to $f$ on $J$, uniformly in $J\in\J_\de$.

Post Undeleted by Iosif Pinelis
added 1727 characters in body
Source Link
Iosif Pinelis
  • 127.9k
  • 8
  • 107
  • 229

It is enough to construct a smooth function $f_\ep$ such that for each $J\in\J$ \begin{equation*} \|f-f_\ep\|_{C^\be(J)}\le L(\al,\be)\ep \tag{10}\label{10} \end{equation*}\begin{equation*} \|f-f_\ep\|_{C^\be(J)}\le100\ep \tag{10}\label{10} \end{equation*} and \begin{equation*} |f_\ep|\le|f|\text{ on } J, \tag{20}\label{20} \end{equation*} where $L(\al,\be)$ is a real number depending only on $\al,\be$.\begin{equation*} |f_\ep|\le|f|\text{ on } J. \tag{20}\label{20} \end{equation*}

To begin such a construction, take any real $\de>0$. Let $\J_\de$ denote the set of all intervals $J\in\J$ of length $>4\de$$>\de$. Of course, the set $\J_\de$ is finite. Let \begin{equation*} f_\ep(x):=0\text{ for }x\in I\setminus\bigcup_{J\in\J_\de}J. \end{equation*}

If $\de$ is small (which will be henceforth assumed), then on $I\setminus\bigcup_{J\in\J_\de}J$ the function $f-f_\ep=f$ is small and $(1,\al)$-Hölder. So, $f-f_\ep=f$ is $(\de_1,\be)$-Hölder on $I\setminus\bigcup_{J\in\J_\de}J$ for a small $\de_1$. This follows because $|y-x|^\al<<|y-x|^\be$ if $\be\in(0,\al)$ (as given) and $|y-x|<<1$, whereas $|y-x|^\al\asymp|y-x|^\be\asymp1$ if $|y-x|\asymp1$. (We write $E<<F$ if $E=o(F)$, $E\ll F$ if $E=O(F)$, and $E\asymp F$ if $E\ll F\ll E$.)

We shall build the function $f_\ep$ separately on each interval $(a,b)\in\J_\de$ we have$J=(a,b)\in\J_\de$, in such a manner that \begin{equation} \text{$f_\ep:=0$ on $(a,a+\de)\cup(b-\de,b)$ }\tag{30}\label{30} \end{equation}\begin{equation*} \text{$f_\ep=0$ near the endpoints of $J$. } \tag{30}\label{30} \end{equation*} andThen the smoothness of $f_\ep$ is smooth on $(a,b)$, theneach interval $f_\ep$$J\in\J$ will be smoothenough for the smoothness of $f_\ep$ on the entire interval $I$.

Take nowindeed any interval $(a,b)\in\J_\de$ indeed. It is enough to construct a function $f_\ep$ which is smooth on $J$ and such that \eqref{10}, \eqref{20}, and \eqref{30} hold$J\in\J_\de$.

Note Note that (i) $f(a)=0=f(b)$ and (ii) either $f>0$ on $(a,b)$ or $f<0$ on $(a,b)$. Wlog, $f>0$ (on $(a,b)$). Moreover, $f$ is continuous. So, \begin{equation*} f\ge2c\text{ on }[a+\de,b-\de] \tag{40}\label{40} \end{equation*} for $M:=f(x_*)\ge f(x)$ for some real $c>0$$x_*\in J$ and all $x\in J$. For a very smallany $\eta\in(0,\de]$$c\in(0,M]$, the points \begin{equation*} x_+(c):=\min\{x\in[x_*,b)\colon f(x)\le c\},\quad x_-(c):=\max\{x\in(a,x_*]\colon f(x)\le c\}. \end{equation*} Then \begin{equation*} f\ge c\text{ on }J_c:=[x_-(c),x_+(c)],\quad f(x_\pm(c))=c. \tag{40}\label{40} \end{equation*}

Let \begin{equation*} g:=(f-c)1_{J_c}. \tag{45}\label{45} \end{equation*} Then $g$ is $(1,\al)$-Hölder on $\R$ and hence so is \begin{equation*} g_\eta:=g*K_\eta, \tag{47}\label{47} \end{equation*} where, for each $\eta\in(0,\de)$, we let $K_\eta$ be aany smooth nonnegative function supported on the interval $[-\eta,\eta]$ such that $\int K_\eta=1$. Let then \begin{equation*} g_\eta:=g*K_\eta, \end{equation*} where \begin{equation*} g:=(f-c)1_{[a+2\de,b-2\de]}. \end{equation*}

ThenMoreover, by \eqref{40}for $x\in J_c=[x_-(c),x_+(c)]$,
\begin{align} g_\eta(x)&=\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x-u)-c)1(x-u\in J_c) \notag \\ &\le\eta^\al+\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x)-c)1(x-u\in J_c) \notag \\ &\le\eta^\al+(f(x)-c)\le f(x) \notag \end{align} assuming that $g\ge0$ and hence$\eta^\al\le c$, in view of conditionswhich will be indeed assumed henceforth.

Further, for $\eta\in(0,\de]$ and \eqref{40}$x\in[x_+(c),x_+(c)+\eta]$,
\begin{align} g_\eta(x)&=\int_{-\de}^\de du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x-u)-c)1(x-u\in[a+2\de,b-2\de]) \tag{45}\label{45} \\ &\le\eta^\al+\int_{-\de}^\de du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x)-c)1(x-u\in[a+2\de,b-2\de]) \notag \\ &\le\eta^\al+(f(x)-c)1(x\in[a+\de,b-\de]) \notag \\ &\le\eta^\al+(f(x)-c)\le f(x) \notag \end{align}\begin{align} g_\eta(x)&=\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x-u)-c)1(x-u\in J_c) \notag \\ &=\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x-u)-f(x_+(c))1(x-u\in J_c) \notag \\ &\le\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(x_+(c)-(x-u))^\al 1(x-u\in [x_-(c),x_+(c)]) \notag \\ &\le\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)\eta^\al 1(x-u\in [x_-(c),x_+(c)]) \le\eta^\al. \notag \end{align} forOn the other hand, again for $x\in(a,b)$ if$x\in[x_+(c),x_+(c)+\eta]$, we have $f(x)\ge f(x_+(c))-(x-x_+(c))^\al\ge c-\eta^\al\ge\eta^\al\ge g_\eta(x)$ assuming that \begin{equation*} \eta\in(0,\min(\de,c^{1/\al})), \tag{50}\label{50} \end{equation*}\begin{equation*} 2\eta^\al\le c, \tag{50}\label{50} \end{equation*} and \eqref{50}which will be henceforthindeed assumed henceforth. AlsoSimilarly, the integrand in$g_\eta(x)\le\eta^\al$ given \eqref{4550} is $\ge0$ for all $x\in(a,b)$ and $=0$ for $x\in(a,a+\de)\cup(b-\de,b)$. So Also, $g_\eta\ge0$ on $(a,b)$ and $g_\eta=0$ on$g_\eta(x)=0\le f(x)$ for $(a,a+\de)\cup(b-\de,b)$$x\in J\setminus J_c$. SoWe conclude that \begin{equation} g_\eta\le f\text{ on }J. \end{equation}

So, letting \begin{equation*} f_\ep:=g_\eta\text{ on }J=(a,b), \end{equation*}\begin{equation*} f_\ep:=g_\eta\text{ on }J=(a,b), \tag{60}\label{60} \end{equation*} we see that $f_\ep$ is smooth on $J=(a,b)$, and conditions \eqref{20} and \eqref{30} hold. Moreover, $g_\eta$ is $(1,\al)$-Hölder on $\R$ and hence $f_\ep$ is $(1,\al)$-Hölder on $J$.

So, it remains to check that condition$f_\ep$ is uniformly close to $f$ on $J$, also uniformly in $J\in\J_\de$.

By \eqref{1045} for our interval, on $J=(a,b)$ holds if$J_c$ the function $\de$ and$g$ is uniformly close to $f$ if $c$ are chosen to beis small enough. This is rather straightforward and, which will be detailed laterhenceforth assumed. Also, for $x\in J\setminus J_c$ we have $0\le f\le\de^\al$, which is small (Itsince $\de$ was assumed to be small) and hence close to $g$ (which is rather late here now.$0$ on $J\setminus J_c$). So, $g$ is uniformly close to $f$ on $J$, uniformly in $J\in\J_\de$.

Finally, because $\eta$ is small, and in view of \eqref{60} and \eqref{47}, we conclude that indeed $f_\ep$ is uniformly close to $f$ on $J$, uniformly in $J\in\J_\de$. $\quad\Box$

It is enough to construct a smooth function $f_\ep$ such that for each $J\in\J$ \begin{equation*} \|f-f_\ep\|_{C^\be(J)}\le L(\al,\be)\ep \tag{10}\label{10} \end{equation*} and \begin{equation*} |f_\ep|\le|f|\text{ on } J, \tag{20}\label{20} \end{equation*} where $L(\al,\be)$ is a real number depending only on $\al,\be$.

To begin such a construction, take any real $\de>0$. Let $\J_\de$ denote the set of all intervals $J\in\J$ of length $>4\de$. Of course, the set $\J_\de$ is finite. Let \begin{equation*} f_\ep(x):=0\text{ for }x\in I\setminus\bigcup_{J\in\J_\de}J. \end{equation*}

If for each interval $(a,b)\in\J_\de$ we have \begin{equation} \text{$f_\ep:=0$ on $(a,a+\de)\cup(b-\de,b)$ }\tag{30}\label{30} \end{equation} and $f_\ep$ is smooth on $(a,b)$, then $f_\ep$ will be smooth on the entire interval $I$.

Take now any interval $(a,b)\in\J_\de$ indeed. It is enough to construct a function $f_\ep$ which is smooth on $J$ and such that \eqref{10}, \eqref{20}, and \eqref{30} hold.

Note that (i) $f(a)=0=f(b)$ and (ii) either $f>0$ on $(a,b)$ or $f<0$ on $(a,b)$. Wlog, $f>0$ (on $(a,b)$). Moreover, $f$ is continuous. So, \begin{equation*} f\ge2c\text{ on }[a+\de,b-\de] \tag{40}\label{40} \end{equation*} for some real $c>0$. For a very small $\eta\in(0,\de]$, let $K_\eta$ be a smooth nonnegative function supported on the interval $[-\eta,\eta]$ such that $\int K_\eta=1$. Let then \begin{equation*} g_\eta:=g*K_\eta, \end{equation*} where \begin{equation*} g:=(f-c)1_{[a+2\de,b-2\de]}. \end{equation*}

Then, by \eqref{40}, $g\ge0$ and hence, in view of conditions $\eta\in(0,\de]$ and \eqref{40},
\begin{align} g_\eta(x)&=\int_{-\de}^\de du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x-u)-c)1(x-u\in[a+2\de,b-2\de]) \tag{45}\label{45} \\ &\le\eta^\al+\int_{-\de}^\de du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x)-c)1(x-u\in[a+2\de,b-2\de]) \notag \\ &\le\eta^\al+(f(x)-c)1(x\in[a+\de,b-\de]) \notag \\ &\le\eta^\al+(f(x)-c)\le f(x) \notag \end{align} for $x\in(a,b)$ if \begin{equation*} \eta\in(0,\min(\de,c^{1/\al})), \tag{50}\label{50} \end{equation*} and \eqref{50} will be henceforth assumed. Also, the integrand in \eqref{45} is $\ge0$ for all $x\in(a,b)$ and $=0$ for $x\in(a,a+\de)\cup(b-\de,b)$. So, $g_\eta\ge0$ on $(a,b)$ and $g_\eta=0$ on $(a,a+\de)\cup(b-\de,b)$. So, letting \begin{equation*} f_\ep:=g_\eta\text{ on }J=(a,b), \end{equation*} we see that $f_\ep$ is smooth on $J=(a,b)$, and conditions \eqref{20} and \eqref{30} hold.

So, it remains to check that condition \eqref{10} for our interval $J=(a,b)$ holds if $\de$ and $c$ are chosen to be small enough. This is rather straightforward and will be detailed later. (It is rather late here now.)

It is enough to construct a smooth function $f_\ep$ such that for each $J\in\J$ \begin{equation*} \|f-f_\ep\|_{C^\be(J)}\le100\ep \tag{10}\label{10} \end{equation*} and \begin{equation*} |f_\ep|\le|f|\text{ on } J. \tag{20}\label{20} \end{equation*}

To begin such a construction, take any real $\de>0$. Let $\J_\de$ denote the set of all intervals $J\in\J$ of length $>\de$. Of course, the set $\J_\de$ is finite. Let \begin{equation*} f_\ep(x):=0\text{ for }x\in I\setminus\bigcup_{J\in\J_\de}J. \end{equation*}

If $\de$ is small (which will be henceforth assumed), then on $I\setminus\bigcup_{J\in\J_\de}J$ the function $f-f_\ep=f$ is small and $(1,\al)$-Hölder. So, $f-f_\ep=f$ is $(\de_1,\be)$-Hölder on $I\setminus\bigcup_{J\in\J_\de}J$ for a small $\de_1$. This follows because $|y-x|^\al<<|y-x|^\be$ if $\be\in(0,\al)$ (as given) and $|y-x|<<1$, whereas $|y-x|^\al\asymp|y-x|^\be\asymp1$ if $|y-x|\asymp1$. (We write $E<<F$ if $E=o(F)$, $E\ll F$ if $E=O(F)$, and $E\asymp F$ if $E\ll F\ll E$.)

We shall build the function $f_\ep$ separately on each interval $J=(a,b)\in\J_\de$, in such a manner that \begin{equation*} \text{$f_\ep=0$ near the endpoints of $J$. } \tag{30}\label{30} \end{equation*} Then the smoothness of $f_\ep$ on each interval $J\in\J$ will be enough for the smoothness of $f_\ep$ on the entire interval $I$.

Take indeed any interval $J\in\J_\de$. Note that (i) $f(a)=0=f(b)$ and (ii) either $f>0$ on $(a,b)$ or $f<0$ on $(a,b)$. Wlog, $f>0$ (on $(a,b)$). Moreover, $f$ is continuous. So, $M:=f(x_*)\ge f(x)$ for some $x_*\in J$ and all $x\in J$. For any $c\in(0,M]$, the points \begin{equation*} x_+(c):=\min\{x\in[x_*,b)\colon f(x)\le c\},\quad x_-(c):=\max\{x\in(a,x_*]\colon f(x)\le c\}. \end{equation*} Then \begin{equation*} f\ge c\text{ on }J_c:=[x_-(c),x_+(c)],\quad f(x_\pm(c))=c. \tag{40}\label{40} \end{equation*}

Let \begin{equation*} g:=(f-c)1_{J_c}. \tag{45}\label{45} \end{equation*} Then $g$ is $(1,\al)$-Hölder on $\R$ and hence so is \begin{equation*} g_\eta:=g*K_\eta, \tag{47}\label{47} \end{equation*} where, for each $\eta\in(0,\de)$, we let $K_\eta$ be any smooth nonnegative function supported on the interval $[-\eta,\eta]$ such that $\int K_\eta=1$.

Moreover, for $x\in J_c=[x_-(c),x_+(c)]$,
\begin{align} g_\eta(x)&=\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x-u)-c)1(x-u\in J_c) \notag \\ &\le\eta^\al+\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x)-c)1(x-u\in J_c) \notag \\ &\le\eta^\al+(f(x)-c)\le f(x) \notag \end{align} assuming that $\eta^\al\le c$, which will be indeed assumed henceforth.

Further, for $x\in[x_+(c),x_+(c)+\eta]$,
\begin{align} g_\eta(x)&=\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x-u)-c)1(x-u\in J_c) \notag \\ &=\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(f(x-u)-f(x_+(c))1(x-u\in J_c) \notag \\ &\le\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)(x_+(c)-(x-u))^\al 1(x-u\in [x_-(c),x_+(c)]) \notag \\ &\le\int_{-\eta}^\eta du\,K_\eta(u)\eta^\al 1(x-u\in [x_-(c),x_+(c)]) \le\eta^\al. \notag \end{align} On the other hand, again for $x\in[x_+(c),x_+(c)+\eta]$, we have $f(x)\ge f(x_+(c))-(x-x_+(c))^\al\ge c-\eta^\al\ge\eta^\al\ge g_\eta(x)$ assuming that \begin{equation*} 2\eta^\al\le c, \tag{50}\label{50} \end{equation*} which will be indeed assumed henceforth. Similarly, $g_\eta(x)\le\eta^\al$ given \eqref{50}. Also, $g_\eta(x)=0\le f(x)$ for $x\in J\setminus J_c$. We conclude that \begin{equation} g_\eta\le f\text{ on }J. \end{equation}

So, letting \begin{equation*} f_\ep:=g_\eta\text{ on }J=(a,b), \tag{60}\label{60} \end{equation*} we see that $f_\ep$ is smooth on $J=(a,b)$, and conditions \eqref{20} and \eqref{30} hold. Moreover, $g_\eta$ is $(1,\al)$-Hölder on $\R$ and hence $f_\ep$ is $(1,\al)$-Hölder on $J$.

So, it remains to check that $f_\ep$ is uniformly close to $f$ on $J$, also uniformly in $J\in\J_\de$.

By \eqref{45}, on $J_c$ the function $g$ is uniformly close to $f$ if $c$ is small enough, which will be henceforth assumed. Also, for $x\in J\setminus J_c$ we have $0\le f\le\de^\al$, which is small (since $\de$ was assumed to be small) and hence close to $g$ (which is $0$ on $J\setminus J_c$). So, $g$ is uniformly close to $f$ on $J$, uniformly in $J\in\J_\de$.

Finally, because $\eta$ is small, and in view of \eqref{60} and \eqref{47}, we conclude that indeed $f_\ep$ is uniformly close to $f$ on $J$, uniformly in $J\in\J_\de$. $\quad\Box$

Post Deleted by Iosif Pinelis
Source Link
Iosif Pinelis
  • 127.9k
  • 8
  • 107
  • 229
Loading