Skip to main content
32 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 28, 2020 at 17:27 review Reopen votes
Dec 29, 2020 at 2:35
S Jul 18, 2013 at 17:38 history notice removed François G. Dorais
S Jul 18, 2013 at 17:38 history unlocked François G. Dorais
S Jul 18, 2013 at 17:37 history notice added François G. Dorais Historical significance
S Jul 18, 2013 at 17:37 history locked François G. Dorais
Jul 9, 2013 at 17:00 history closed Andrej Bauer
Ramiro de la Vega
Steven Landsburg
David White
Chris Godsil
Not suitable for this site
Jul 9, 2013 at 9:19 review Close votes
Jul 9, 2013 at 17:00
Sep 13, 2011 at 19:51 vote accept Sonia Balagopalan
Sep 13, 2011 at 0:39 answer added Vijay D timeline score: 7
Sep 12, 2011 at 23:32 comment added Kaveh related: blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2011/09/next-in-sequence.html blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2011/08/…
Sep 12, 2011 at 21:36 answer added Timothy Chow timeline score: 30
Jan 28, 2011 at 1:12 vote accept Sonia Balagopalan
Sep 13, 2011 at 19:51
Jan 23, 2011 at 2:10 comment added darij grinberg I fear that (1) being asked over and over doesn't make a boring question interesting, and (2) a question being boring doesn't make its opposite question interesting. (But please don't try stating and proving these two claims rigorously, because this will trigger the same paradox as the original post: If we had a strict mathematical definition of "interesting" (which is what Sonia calls 'valid'), then the smallest non-interesting object would become interesting.)
Jan 23, 2011 at 0:28 answer added Nick S timeline score: 0
Nov 24, 2010 at 4:06 comment added timur Incidentally, this is what physicists have been doing.
Jan 28, 2010 at 18:36 comment added aorq That does explain the comment history. Thanks.
Jan 28, 2010 at 18:06 comment added Sonia Balagopalan @Charles Roque: Scott posted his comment when this question was rather stupidly named "Continuing a finite sequence." I just changed it to the current title today. Orthogonally, it's interesting how a title-change translates into interest in a question terms of views and votes. (I got 3 upvotes within a couple of hours.)
Jan 28, 2010 at 16:31 comment added aorq @Scott: wait, wouldn't an affirmative answer to this question be more like starving people who come asking us to continue a sequence?
Jan 28, 2010 at 13:23 history edited Sonia Balagopalan CC BY-SA 2.5
changed title
Nov 27, 2009 at 18:31 comment added Gil Kalai I like the question and it led to 8 nice answers
Nov 7, 2009 at 8:07 answer added Jose Brox timeline score: 1
Nov 7, 2009 at 6:08 comment added Kim Morrison -1, this isn't mathematics, and we shouldn't feed the people who are inevitably (and have already) going to come and ask us "what's the next number in ..."
Nov 7, 2009 at 5:10 answer added fedja timeline score: 3
Nov 6, 2009 at 23:01 answer added Kristal Cantwell timeline score: 4
Nov 6, 2009 at 22:47 answer added S. Carnahan timeline score: 20
Nov 6, 2009 at 22:32 answer added Gabe Cunningham timeline score: 2
Nov 6, 2009 at 22:17 answer added Jason Dyer timeline score: 4
Nov 6, 2009 at 22:00 comment added Qiaochu Yuan In response to your edit, this is philosophy and linguistics, not logic. What is natural or unexpected depends entirely on what kind of patterns you prefer.
Nov 6, 2009 at 21:56 history edited Sonia Balagopalan CC BY-SA 2.5
clarified(?)
Nov 6, 2009 at 21:42 answer added Qiaochu Yuan timeline score: 15
Nov 6, 2009 at 21:42 answer added HJRW timeline score: 1
Nov 6, 2009 at 21:38 history asked Sonia Balagopalan CC BY-SA 2.5