Timeline for Is there a theorem that says that there is always more than one way to "continue a finite sequence"? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
32 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 28, 2020 at 17:27 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Dec 29, 2020 at 2:35 | |||||
S Jul 18, 2013 at 17:38 | history | notice removed | François G. Dorais | ||
S Jul 18, 2013 at 17:38 | history | unlocked | François G. Dorais | ||
S Jul 18, 2013 at 17:37 | history | notice added | François G. Dorais | Historical significance | |
S Jul 18, 2013 at 17:37 | history | locked | François G. Dorais | ||
Jul 9, 2013 at 17:00 | history | closed |
Andrej Bauer Ramiro de la Vega Steven Landsburg David White Chris Godsil |
Not suitable for this site | |
Jul 9, 2013 at 9:19 | review | Close votes | |||
Jul 9, 2013 at 17:00 | |||||
Sep 13, 2011 at 19:51 | vote | accept | Sonia Balagopalan | ||
Sep 13, 2011 at 0:39 | answer | added | Vijay D | timeline score: 7 | |
Sep 12, 2011 at 23:32 | comment | added | Kaveh | related: blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2011/09/next-in-sequence.html blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2011/08/… | |
Sep 12, 2011 at 21:36 | answer | added | Timothy Chow | timeline score: 30 | |
Jan 28, 2011 at 1:12 | vote | accept | Sonia Balagopalan | ||
Sep 13, 2011 at 19:51 | |||||
Jan 23, 2011 at 2:10 | comment | added | darij grinberg | I fear that (1) being asked over and over doesn't make a boring question interesting, and (2) a question being boring doesn't make its opposite question interesting. (But please don't try stating and proving these two claims rigorously, because this will trigger the same paradox as the original post: If we had a strict mathematical definition of "interesting" (which is what Sonia calls 'valid'), then the smallest non-interesting object would become interesting.) | |
Jan 23, 2011 at 0:28 | answer | added | Nick S | timeline score: 0 | |
Nov 24, 2010 at 4:06 | comment | added | timur | Incidentally, this is what physicists have been doing. | |
Jan 28, 2010 at 18:36 | comment | added | aorq | That does explain the comment history. Thanks. | |
Jan 28, 2010 at 18:06 | comment | added | Sonia Balagopalan | @Charles Roque: Scott posted his comment when this question was rather stupidly named "Continuing a finite sequence." I just changed it to the current title today. Orthogonally, it's interesting how a title-change translates into interest in a question terms of views and votes. (I got 3 upvotes within a couple of hours.) | |
Jan 28, 2010 at 16:31 | comment | added | aorq | @Scott: wait, wouldn't an affirmative answer to this question be more like starving people who come asking us to continue a sequence? | |
Jan 28, 2010 at 13:23 | history | edited | Sonia Balagopalan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
changed title
|
Nov 27, 2009 at 18:31 | comment | added | Gil Kalai | I like the question and it led to 8 nice answers | |
Nov 7, 2009 at 8:07 | answer | added | Jose Brox | timeline score: 1 | |
Nov 7, 2009 at 6:08 | comment | added | Kim Morrison | -1, this isn't mathematics, and we shouldn't feed the people who are inevitably (and have already) going to come and ask us "what's the next number in ..." | |
Nov 7, 2009 at 5:10 | answer | added | fedja | timeline score: 3 | |
Nov 6, 2009 at 23:01 | answer | added | Kristal Cantwell | timeline score: 4 | |
Nov 6, 2009 at 22:47 | answer | added | S. Carnahan♦ | timeline score: 20 | |
Nov 6, 2009 at 22:32 | answer | added | Gabe Cunningham | timeline score: 2 | |
Nov 6, 2009 at 22:17 | answer | added | Jason Dyer | timeline score: 4 | |
Nov 6, 2009 at 22:00 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | In response to your edit, this is philosophy and linguistics, not logic. What is natural or unexpected depends entirely on what kind of patterns you prefer. | |
Nov 6, 2009 at 21:56 | history | edited | Sonia Balagopalan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
clarified(?)
|
Nov 6, 2009 at 21:42 | answer | added | Qiaochu Yuan | timeline score: 15 | |
Nov 6, 2009 at 21:42 | answer | added | HJRW | timeline score: 1 | |
Nov 6, 2009 at 21:38 | history | asked | Sonia Balagopalan | CC BY-SA 2.5 |