Skip to main content
20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 17, 2010 at 0:40 vote accept user02138
Nov 4, 2010 at 8:05 vote accept user02138
Nov 4, 2010 at 8:06
Nov 1, 2010 at 22:55 comment added Gerry Myerson OK, much better. $\vartheta=\theta^2$, no?
Nov 1, 2010 at 15:06 comment added user02138 Hi Gerry. The formula is $\lfloor \vartheta^{2^{i-1}} - \frac{1}{2} \rfloor$, not $\lfloor \vartheta^{2^{i}} - \frac{1}{2} \rfloor$. Take $i = 3$, \begin{eqnarray} \lfloor \theta^{2^{3}} + \tfrac{1}{2} \rfloor - 1 = \lfloor \vartheta^{2^{2}} - \tfrac{1}{2} \rfloor = 6, \end{eqnarray} where $\theta$ and $\vartheta$ as above.
Nov 1, 2010 at 12:00 comment added Gerry Myerson Never mind those websites, I'm asking YOU: does it make sense that $d_i$ is pretty much $a^{2^i}$ while $d_i-1$ is pretty much $b^{2^i}$ for some $b$ not equal to $a$? I mean, take $i=3$, say, and calculate those powers, and make your own judgement as to what's reasonable.
Nov 1, 2010 at 6:13 history edited user02138 CC BY-SA 2.5
added 9 characters in body
Nov 1, 2010 at 5:51 comment added user02138 As for the double exponential growth formulas that I quote above, see OEIS entries, along with Wikipedia and MathWorld articles for "Sylvester's Sequence".
Nov 1, 2010 at 5:44 history edited user02138 CC BY-SA 2.5
deleted 12 characters in body; Post Made Community Wiki
Nov 1, 2010 at 5:37 history edited user02138 CC BY-SA 2.5
deleted 2 characters in body
Nov 1, 2010 at 5:31 history edited user02138 CC BY-SA 2.5
added 21 characters in body
Nov 1, 2010 at 5:22 history edited user02138 CC BY-SA 2.5
added 37 characters in body; added 7 characters in body
Nov 1, 2010 at 5:19 comment added user02138 Right, it's not as sharp as I'd like. For the case that you mention, 7/12 = 1/(2+1) + 1/(3+1) <= 1/2 + 1/6 = 2/3 isn't best possible but it'll do until I have a better understanding of the sequence 3,4,6,8,12,30,128,1932,309122...
Nov 1, 2010 at 4:39 comment added Gerry Myerson Also, the bounds given in this answer can't be the sharp bounds you asked for since (for example) it's impossible to have $p+1=d_1=2$. For $\omega(k)=2$ it would seem that the sharp bound is $(1/3)+(1/4)=7/12$ obtained for $k=6$.
Nov 1, 2010 at 4:33 comment added Gerry Myerson Can it really be that $d_i=\lfloor\theta^{2^i}+(1/2)\rfloor$ where $\theta\approx1.264$, while $d_i-1=\lfloor\vartheta^{2^i}-(1/2)\rfloor$ where $\vartheta\approx1.5979$?
Nov 1, 2010 at 2:17 vote accept user02138
Nov 1, 2010 at 2:18
Nov 1, 2010 at 2:16 history edited user02138 CC BY-SA 2.5
deleted 2 characters in body
Nov 1, 2010 at 2:11 history edited user02138 CC BY-SA 2.5
added 30 characters in body
Nov 1, 2010 at 2:04 history edited user02138 CC BY-SA 2.5
added 229 characters in body; edited body; deleted 8 characters in body
Nov 1, 2010 at 1:59 history edited user02138 CC BY-SA 2.5
added 121 characters in body
Nov 1, 2010 at 1:53 history answered user02138 CC BY-SA 2.5