Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 4, 2023 at 2:01 comment added Hanul Jeon @AliEnayat That is true that the subscript 0 looks attached to $\omega$ instead of the whole theory, I cannot deny that, so I swapped the order of 0 and $\omega$.
Apr 4, 2023 at 1:59 history edited Hanul Jeon CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Apr 3, 2023 at 18:32 comment added Ali Enayat @HanulJeon Yes, there is no standard terminology here (for example in the older references $\mathsf{KP}$ includes the full scheme of foundation (equivalently, the full scheme of $\in$-induction). The problem I have with your current notation is that the subscript 0 visually seems to be attached to $\omega$, as opposed the whole package $\mathsf{KF}_{\omega}$, which is how you intend it.
Apr 2, 2023 at 17:54 comment added Hanul Jeon @AliEnayat I did not use it because some references use KPI to denote KP with cofinality many recursively inaccessible ordinals.
Apr 1, 2023 at 15:18 comment added Ali Enayat @HanulJeon Just a notational suggestion for long term purposes: $\mathsf{KPI}_0$ instead of $\mathsf{KP}_{\omega_0}$ , which is more in tune with other existing notation.
Mar 27, 2023 at 3:56 history edited Hanul Jeon CC BY-SA 4.0
added 177 characters in body
Mar 27, 2023 at 3:38 comment added Hanul Jeon @FarmerS Yes. This is what I meant.
Mar 27, 2023 at 2:28 answer added Farmer S timeline score: 7
Mar 27, 2023 at 1:41 comment added Farmer S By "$\Gamma$-Foundation", do you mean the scheme where for every $\Gamma$ formula $\varphi$, we have the axiom that says "For every $p$, if for every $x$, we have $\Big(\forall y\in x\ \varphi(p,y)\Big)\implies\varphi(p,x)$, then for every $x$, we have $\varphi(p,x)$"?
Mar 25, 2023 at 22:44 history asked Hanul Jeon CC BY-SA 4.0