Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 31, 2023 at 23:27 vote accept Krill
Mar 30, 2023 at 15:56 answer added tkr timeline score: 13
Mar 27, 2023 at 16:32 comment added Krill @TabesBridges I do indeed like this as a general explanation, but it would be nice to see an explicit example of when non-continuous valuations give us "the wrong thing" or something like that.
Mar 27, 2023 at 16:31 comment added Krill @Satan'sMinion that is helpful for explaining the $A^+$. I'd have to see explicitly what's going on, but that's a good justification. Thanks for mentioning this resource, I hadn't been using them as much.
Mar 25, 2023 at 13:38 comment added Satan's Minion Did you read section 3.3 in the Berkeley lectures?
Mar 25, 2023 at 6:59 comment added Z. M One "reason" for continuous valuations is that, if I understand correctly, they are precisely points of the distributive lattice generated by basic open subsets (whose definition does not really depend on points).
Mar 25, 2023 at 5:40 comment added Tabes Bridges Regarding your first question: I know nothing about these things, but given that the rings involved are topological, it would make sense to only consider valuations that in some way acknowledge the topology.
Mar 25, 2023 at 2:41 history asked Krill CC BY-SA 4.0