Skip to main content

Timeline for Most memorable titles

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 12 at 21:31 history edited QCD_IS_GOOD CC BY-SA 4.0
link seems dead, updated to internet archived copy
Nov 23, 2022 at 15:10 comment added Jorge Zuniga Great. This title despite its seriousness left me with a big smile
Oct 24, 2020 at 16:06 comment added Hollis Williams I disagree. The title is objective: he is simply saying that he has realised that the conjecture is false when one thinks carefully about it and that this escaped the attention of Hodge in formulating it. I don't see the arrogance in that title, although I have seen it other works of Grothendieck that I have read.
Feb 6, 2018 at 19:48 comment added David E Speyer Grothendieck's paper is 5 pages, and seems to explain itself pretty clearly.
Feb 6, 2018 at 17:10 comment added Mikhail Katz If there is a paper explaining what Grothendieck actually says here, it may be worth mentioning the number of pages thereof :-)
May 8, 2011 at 14:50 comment added Todd Trimble I don't think it's offensive at all -- all one has to do is read a few words of the paper to see that Grothendieck is merely performing a small but useful service. The title is catchy enough that one is easily invited to discover just that.
May 2, 2011 at 22:12 comment added Lennart Meier It is a modest title (though it might be taken to be offensive) - he doesn't say: "The Hodge Conjecture is false for very deep reasons and only I could have disproved it."
Dec 28, 2010 at 21:44 comment added Joël I dissent. This title is arrogant and vulgar ("trivial" is a ugly word), unworthy of Grothendieck who invented a lot of beautiful, decently modest, and often informative title, such as "Sur quelques points d'algèbre homologique" or "Récoltes et semailles", or "à la poursuite des champs".
Oct 31, 2010 at 16:35 comment added Suvrit That is indeed a great title!
Oct 31, 2010 at 15:58 comment added Gunnar Þór Magnússon I love that title so much.
Oct 31, 2010 at 15:04 history answered David E Speyer CC BY-SA 2.5