Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 1, 2023 at 17:33 comment added math54321 @ThomasSauvaget Good point - for instance $A_n$ has trace zero iff $n \equiv 2 \pmod 4$. I also computed some characteristic polynomials, but did not see any patterns at first glance
Apr 1, 2023 at 4:15 comment added Thomas Sauvaget Side question : if primality is encoded by the number of non-zero eigenvalues, one can wonder what other properties are encoded in the rest of the spectrum.
Mar 29, 2023 at 10:11 comment added Thomas Sauvaget Small remark : since it has been checked up to 1024, it is in particular true for the first Carmichael number (aka pseudo prime) 561, which adds some weight to the conjecture.
Mar 28, 2023 at 7:34 history edited Rodrigo de Azevedo CC BY-SA 4.0
added 19 characters in body
Mar 28, 2023 at 6:53 comment added Maarten Havinga @math54321 I see indeed, was too early with posting
Mar 27, 2023 at 19:15 comment added math54321 @MaartenHavinga I don't think that $n = 8$ gives a Hadamard matrix. Indeed $A_8 A_8^T$ is not even diagonal
Mar 27, 2023 at 18:18 comment added Maarten Havinga All I can add is that for $n=2^k$, it's the $n×n$ Hadamard matrix obtained from Sylvester's construction. However it does not give Hadamard matrices for other $n$.
Mar 27, 2023 at 8:51 answer added Per Alexandersson timeline score: 1
Mar 23, 2023 at 18:18 history edited math54321 CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 15 characters in body
Mar 22, 2023 at 22:04 answer added Peter Mueller timeline score: 5
Mar 22, 2023 at 21:06 comment added darij grinberg No -- I was thinking that divisors of $n$ would lead to equal rows in $A$.
Mar 22, 2023 at 20:25 comment added math54321 @darijgrinberg Maybe you were secretly thinking about $\dim \ker$ instead of rank :) Somewhat related, I don't know if there's a good way of viewing $A_n, A_m$ as blocks inside $A_{nm}$
Mar 22, 2023 at 19:55 comment added darij grinberg Curious! My intuition would have suggested that $A_n$ should have the smaller (not greater) rank the more divisors $n$ has, and yet it is apparently the other way round.
S Mar 22, 2023 at 19:25 review First questions
Mar 22, 2023 at 19:42
S Mar 22, 2023 at 19:25 history asked math54321 CC BY-SA 4.0