Skip to main content
Notice removed Draw attention by CommunityBot
Bounty Ended with no winning answer by CommunityBot
added 26 characters in body
Source Link
Andromeda
  • 175
  • 2
  • 17

Consider the following fragments from Takesaki's second volume "Theory of operator algebras" (chapter VIII $\oint 3$, Modular Automorphism groups, p107-108:

enter image description here

enter image description here

Why are the second and third line in $(12)$ true? For example, I am not able to convince myself that we have the inclusion $$S(\mathfrak{D}^\sharp \cap \mathfrak{H}_1)\subseteq \mathfrak{H}_1.$$ Probably, some general fact about unbounded operators and their closures is used here but I am unable to identify what exactly I need.

Thanks in advance for yourany help/comments/insights!

Consider the following fragments from Takesaki's second volume "Theory of operator algebras" (chapter VIII $\oint 3$, Modular Automorphism groups, p107-108:

enter image description here

enter image description here

Why are the second and third line in $(12)$ true? For example, I am not able to convince myself that we have the inclusion $$S(\mathfrak{D}^\sharp \cap \mathfrak{H}_1)\subseteq \mathfrak{H}_1.$$ Probably, some general fact about unbounded operators and their closures is used here but I am unable to identify what exactly I need.

Thanks in advance for your help/comments/insights!

Consider the following fragments from Takesaki's second volume "Theory of operator algebras" (chapter VIII $\oint 3$, Modular Automorphism groups, p107-108:

enter image description here

enter image description here

Why are the second and third line in $(12)$ true? For example, I am not able to convince myself that we have the inclusion $$S(\mathfrak{D}^\sharp \cap \mathfrak{H}_1)\subseteq \mathfrak{H}_1.$$ Probably, some general fact about unbounded operators and their closures is used here but I am unable to identify what exactly I need.

Thanks in advance for any help/comments/insights!

added 1 character in body; edited title
Source Link
Andromeda
  • 175
  • 2
  • 17

Takesaki II "Connes cocycle derivative"

Consider the following fragments from Takesaki's second volume "Theory of operator algebras" (chapter VIII $\int 3$$\oint 3$, Modular Automorphism groups, p107-108:

enter image description here

enter image description here

Why are the second and third line in $(12)$ true? For example, I am not able to convince myself that we have the inclusion $$S(\mathfrak{D}^\sharp \cap \mathfrak{H}_1)\subseteq \mathfrak{H}_1.$$ Probably, some general fact about unbounded operators and their closures is used here but I am unable to identify what exactly I need.

Thanks in advance for your help/comments/insights!

Takesaki "Connes cocycle derivative"

Consider the following fragments from Takesaki's second volume "Theory of operator algebras" (chapter VIII $\int 3$, Modular Automorphism groups, p107-108:

enter image description here

enter image description here

Why are the second and third line in $(12)$ true? For example, I am not able to convince myself that we have the inclusion $$S(\mathfrak{D}^\sharp \cap \mathfrak{H}_1)\subseteq \mathfrak{H}_1.$$ Probably, some general fact about unbounded operators and their closures is used here but I am unable to identify what exactly I need.

Thanks in advance for your help/comments/insights!

Takesaki II "Connes cocycle derivative"

Consider the following fragments from Takesaki's second volume "Theory of operator algebras" (chapter VIII $\oint 3$, Modular Automorphism groups, p107-108:

enter image description here

enter image description here

Why are the second and third line in $(12)$ true? For example, I am not able to convince myself that we have the inclusion $$S(\mathfrak{D}^\sharp \cap \mathfrak{H}_1)\subseteq \mathfrak{H}_1.$$ Probably, some general fact about unbounded operators and their closures is used here but I am unable to identify what exactly I need.

Thanks in advance for your help/comments/insights!

Notice added Draw attention by Andromeda
Bounty Started worth 100 reputation by Andromeda
added 18 characters in body
Source Link
Andromeda
  • 175
  • 2
  • 17

Consider the following fragments from Takesaki's second volume "Theory of operator algebras" (chapter VIII $\int 3$, Modular Automorphism groups, p107-108:

enter image description here

enter image description here

Why are the second and third line in $(12)$ true? For example, I am not able to convince myself that we have the inclusion $$S(\mathfrak{D}^\sharp \cap \mathfrak{H}_1)\subseteq \mathfrak{H}_1.$$ Probably, some general fact about unbounded operators and their closures is used here but I am unable to identify what exactly I need.

Thanks in advance for your help/comments/insights!

Consider the following fragments from Takesaki's second volume "Theory of operator algebras" (chapter VIII $\int 3$, Modular Automorphism groups, p107-108:

enter image description here

enter image description here

Why are the second and third line in $(12)$ true? For example, I am not able to convince myself that we have the inclusion $$S(\mathfrak{D}^\sharp \cap \mathfrak{H}_1)\subseteq \mathfrak{H}_1.$$ Probably, some general fact about unbounded operators and their closures is used here but I am unable to identify what exactly I need.

Thanks in advance for your help!

Consider the following fragments from Takesaki's second volume "Theory of operator algebras" (chapter VIII $\int 3$, Modular Automorphism groups, p107-108:

enter image description here

enter image description here

Why are the second and third line in $(12)$ true? For example, I am not able to convince myself that we have the inclusion $$S(\mathfrak{D}^\sharp \cap \mathfrak{H}_1)\subseteq \mathfrak{H}_1.$$ Probably, some general fact about unbounded operators and their closures is used here but I am unable to identify what exactly I need.

Thanks in advance for your help/comments/insights!

added 30 characters in body
Source Link
Andromeda
  • 175
  • 2
  • 17
Loading
Source Link
Andromeda
  • 175
  • 2
  • 17
Loading