Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Apr 3, 2023 at 12:02 history bounty ended CommunityBot
S Apr 3, 2023 at 12:02 history notice removed CommunityBot
Apr 1, 2023 at 2:37 comment added fedja "I don't see how to mimic the proof of Newman here." Just follow it literally until you hit the non-commutativity issue and show us where you get. There is a small trick in the end, which is to freeze the non-smooth entries before looking at the FT of the convolution, but let's go over Newman's scheme first: it is very elegant and powerful, so I'd rather let you try it yourself. BTW, when responding to me, you'd better add @fedja somewhere, so that I would be alerted that something is going on :-)
S Mar 26, 2023 at 9:54 history bounty started Quentin
S Mar 26, 2023 at 9:54 history notice added Quentin Authoritative reference needed
Mar 26, 2023 at 9:53 history edited Quentin CC BY-SA 4.0
added 10 characters in body
Mar 22, 2023 at 13:42 comment added Quentin Thank you. I tried to do something in this spirit. If $k_n(t) = P_n k(t) P_n$, I believe that $I - \hat{k}_n(z)$ is indeed invertible for all $\Re(z) \geq 0$, provided n is large enough. So by the standard Paley-Wiener's theorem, there exists $r_n \in L^1(\mathbb{R}_+)$ such that $r_n(t)= k_n(t) + \int_0^t{k_n(t-s) r_n(s) ds}$. Now my main problem is how to check that $sup_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \int_0^\infty{ \lVert r_n(t) \rVert dt} < \infty$ ? Did I miss something? I don't see how to mimic the proof of Newman here.
Mar 21, 2023 at 5:10 comment added fedja If we are in a separable Hilbert space $H$, why don't we just use a family of finite-dimensional spaces $H_n$ expanding to $H$ and the corresponding family of orthogonal projections $P_n$? We have $\|P_nk(t)P_n-k(t)\|\to 0$ point-wise (due to compactness) and $\|k(t)\|$ is the integrable majorant, so $P_nkP_n$ tends to $k$ in $L^1$, after which we can approximate $P_nkP_n$ (and, thus, $k$) by a $C_0^\infty$ operator-valued function $k_1(t)$ in $L^1$ and mimic the Newman proof of Wiener's theorem (ams.org/proc/1975-048-01/S0002-9939-1975-0365002-8/… )?
Mar 20, 2023 at 15:25 history edited Quentin CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1 character in body
Mar 20, 2023 at 14:48 comment added LSpice Spelling note: almost certainly you meant Paley–Wiener (not ‘Palay’). I edited accordingly.
Mar 20, 2023 at 14:45 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Proofreading; link to book; deleted "thanks"
S Mar 20, 2023 at 14:41 review First questions
Mar 20, 2023 at 14:46
S Mar 20, 2023 at 14:41 history asked Quentin CC BY-SA 4.0