Timeline for $\frac {f (0)}{2}+ \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}f (k)=\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} \mathcal{L} \{ f \} (2 \pi i n)$
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2023 at 9:59 | history | edited | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 147 characters in body
|
| Mar 28, 2023 at 9:45 | history | edited | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 810 characters in body
|
| Mar 12, 2023 at 11:32 | history | edited | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 355 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Mar 10, 2023 at 8:50 | history | edited | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 85 characters in body
|
| Mar 9, 2023 at 20:29 | history | edited | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 119 characters in body
|
| Mar 9, 2023 at 19:24 | vote | accept | Wreior | ||
| Mar 9, 2023 at 17:47 | history | edited | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Mar 9, 2023 at 15:57 | answer | added | Carlo Beenakker | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 9, 2023 at 15:36 | history | edited | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 169 characters in body; edited title
|
| Mar 9, 2023 at 15:27 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 16, 2023 at 3:06 | |||||
| Mar 9, 2023 at 15:08 | history | edited | LSpice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Punctuation
|
| Mar 9, 2023 at 13:42 | history | edited | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 114 characters in body; edited title
|
| Mar 9, 2023 at 12:35 | history | edited | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 379 characters in body
|
| Mar 9, 2023 at 12:16 | history | edited | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 184 characters in body; edited title
|
| Mar 9, 2023 at 9:03 | comment | added | Wreior | Or differently. Is it posible to prove my form of equation from Poisson summation | |
| Mar 9, 2023 at 8:57 | comment | added | Wreior | It could be. But then how to transform my equation into $\sum\limits_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}f (n)=\sum\limits_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\hat {f} (n)$ | |
| Mar 9, 2023 at 8:52 | history | edited | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 104 characters in body; edited title
|
| Mar 8, 2023 at 22:13 | comment | added | Anurag Sahay | Is $\mathcal{L}$ supposed to be the Laplace transform? The Laplace transform can be thought of as a change of variable of the Fourier transform, and I think your equality is just Poisson summation with that change of variable made. | |
| Mar 8, 2023 at 21:08 | history | edited | Daniele Tampieri | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Formatting+minor grammar and Math Jaxing
|
| Mar 8, 2023 at 18:55 | history | edited | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 175 characters in body
|
| Mar 8, 2023 at 18:03 | history | edited | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 53 characters in body
|
| Mar 8, 2023 at 17:53 | history | edited | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 16 characters in body
|
| S Mar 8, 2023 at 17:46 | review | First questions | |||
| Mar 8, 2023 at 19:54 | |||||
| S Mar 8, 2023 at 17:46 | history | asked | Wreior | CC BY-SA 4.0 |