Skip to main content
added link for convenience
Source Link

Yes. This follows directly from 5.1 in Strong conceptual completeness for first-order logic by Makkai (1988, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, doi:10.1016/0168-0072(88)90019-X).

Yes. This follows directly from 5.1 in Strong conceptual completeness for first-order logic by Makkai.

Yes. This follows directly from 5.1 in Strong conceptual completeness for first-order logic by Makkai (1988, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, doi:10.1016/0168-0072(88)90019-X).

Source Link
Ivan Di Liberti
  • 9.1k
  • 1
  • 27
  • 66

Yes. This follows directly from 5.1 in Strong conceptual completeness for first-order logic by Makkai.