Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 2, 2023 at 17:24 comment added cs89 Have you looked into the optimal control bibliography? The second part of the question seems very similar to the Pontryagin maximum principle with constraints. With the notations of control theory, you would be looking to minimize the objective function $\Psi(x(T)) := x(T)$ where the scalar state satisfies $\dot{x}(t) = u(t)$, $x(0) = a$ with the state constraint $x(t) \geq 0$ and the control constraint $u(t) \geq h(t)$. It looks like the PMP should then imply that, for each $t$, either $u(t) = h(t)$ or $x(t) = 0$. Maybe this doesn't help because you somehow ask for the converse implication.
Mar 2, 2023 at 16:30 comment added Leo Moos Oops, how silly! Thanks for pointing this out.
Mar 2, 2023 at 16:26 history edited Denis Serre CC BY-SA 4.0
added 14 characters in body
Mar 2, 2023 at 16:26 comment added Denis Serre @Leo Oh yes, $u(0)=a$. But $u=v_+$ is not the solution, because it does not always satisfy $u'\ge h$ (when $v<0$).
Mar 2, 2023 at 15:40 comment added Leo Moos You did not specify the role of $a$ - I presume you're imposing $u(0) = a$? I'm guessing you're not happy with the naive approach, namely to first put $v(t) = a + \int_0^t h$, and then defining $u = \max \{ v , 0 \}$, because $u' = h$ is only satisfied at a.e. point of $\{ u \neq 0 \}$?
Mar 2, 2023 at 15:23 history asked Denis Serre CC BY-SA 4.0