Timeline for Arguments against large cardinals
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2019 at 13:36 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I waited a bit before editing the link, see the comments here: https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/10243/2019/1/11 (I have included the Wayback Machine link - feel free to remove it or replace it with doi-link, if you prefer.)
|
| Jan 11, 2019 at 11:36 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak |
And in this specific case, it seems that url does not have to be changed that much: people.clas.ufl.edu/wjm/files/covering.pdf (I simply changed /papers/ to /files.) Anyway, if more discussion on updating dead links is needed, let's continue in chat - so that we do not leave many comments digressing from the topic of the post.
|
|
| Jan 11, 2019 at 11:23 | comment | added | Martin Sleziak | @ToddTrimble Well, Wayback Machine has some snapshot. I suppose that doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5764-9_19 is behind paywall...? | |
| Jan 8, 2019 at 15:58 | comment | added | Andrés E. Caicedo | @Todd Oh, yes, the university "reorganized" their pages, and lots of things disappeared as a result. I'll see if I can locate an alternative link. | |
| Jan 8, 2019 at 15:43 | comment | added | Todd Trimble | Too bad Mitchell's paper can't be found at the linked page. | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| Dec 19, 2014 at 7:43 | comment | added | goblin GONE | @StefanGeschke, this reminds me of the "obviousness" of the consistency of unrestricted comprehension. In some sense, it was SUCH a natural axiom schema, it couldn't possibly be consistent. Some things are too perfect to be true. | |
| Jul 23, 2013 at 17:52 | comment | added | Andrés E. Caicedo | @StevenStadnicki Hugh Woodin obtained some results as part of his work pursuing what he calls "ultimate $L$". In particular, in Suitable extender models I, J. Math. Log., 10 (1-2), (2010), 101–339. MR2802084 (2012g:03135), he proves in section 7.2 (see page 318 and Theorem 228) that a reasonable conjecture (the $\mathsf{HOD}$-conjecture) implies in $\mathsf{ZF}$ that if there is a proper class of extendible cardinals, then $V$ is rigid. | |
| Jul 23, 2013 at 17:42 | history | edited | Andrés E. Caicedo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2923 characters in body
|
| Jul 23, 2013 at 17:28 | comment | added | Steven Stadnicki | Andres: can you describe briefly the current research into rigidity of $V$ without choice? I'm somewhat amateurishly curious into set theory 'in the large' without choice, and haven't heard about these results... | |
| Oct 30, 2010 at 10:02 | comment | added | Stefan Geschke | Jensen once pointed out to me that he found Reinhardt's "ultimate axiom" extremely appealing and that he was devastated after hearing of Kunen's proof that Reinhardt cardinals don't exist. So apparently Jensen intuition at some point said that Reinhardt cardinals should exist. On the other hand, as you point out, this was rather quickly rectified. | |
| Oct 30, 2010 at 5:39 | history | edited | Andrés E. Caicedo | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
Added references to Maddy's work. Turned a comment into part of the answer.
|
| Oct 29, 2010 at 22:00 | history | answered | Andrés E. Caicedo | CC BY-SA 2.5 |