Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 1, 2023 at 13:23 history edited Peter Scholze CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 227 characters in body
Mar 1, 2023 at 10:42 comment added Zhen Lin I think the constructively correct way of constructing the prime spectrum of a ring is by looking at prime filters rather than prime ideals. A prime filter is a multiplicatively closed subset containing $1$ and such that if $a + b$ is a member, then at least one of $a$ or $b$ are members. Of course, this is classically equivalent to being the complement of a prime ideal, so I suppose in a context with enough points it is equivalent to speak of ideals whose complements are multiplicatively closed and contain $1$.
Mar 1, 2023 at 10:20 comment added Ivan Di Liberti As I discuss also in "The geometry of coherent topoi and ultrastructures", one should also acknowledge the work of Marmolejo on this topic, besides Makkai, Lurie and Barwick-Haine.
Feb 28, 2023 at 20:14 comment added Peter Scholze Yes. The condensed structure it acquires gives the constructible topology of $\mathrm{Spec}(A)$. To see the actual Zariski topology, it is then sufficient to remember the specializations, recorded in the poset structure.
Feb 28, 2023 at 20:11 comment added Mike Shulman Just so I understand completely: are you saying that the internal spectrum constructed in condensed sets does not get the condensed structure induced from the open-set Zariski topology in the naive way, but that it is instead the "correct" condensed structure in a different sense?
Feb 27, 2023 at 22:12 history undeleted Peter Scholze
Feb 27, 2023 at 22:11 history edited Peter Scholze CC BY-SA 4.0
added 282 characters in body
Feb 27, 2023 at 22:00 history deleted Peter Scholze via Vote
Feb 27, 2023 at 21:55 history undeleted Peter Scholze
Feb 27, 2023 at 21:55 history edited Peter Scholze CC BY-SA 4.0
added 324 characters in body
Feb 27, 2023 at 21:45 history deleted Peter Scholze via Vote
Feb 27, 2023 at 21:41 history answered Peter Scholze CC BY-SA 4.0