Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 28, 2023 at 9:24 comment added Dave Benson I think it's an example of the fact that there are only so many small simple groups, and some of them happen to coincide. Another example is that $U_4({\mathbb F}_2)$, $PSp_4({\mathbb F_3})$ and the derived group of $W(E_6)$ are all isomorphic.
Feb 28, 2023 at 2:03 comment added LSpice @DaveBenson, is that just a fact of life, or is there some conceptual reason for it? (I don't know how conceptual I can hope for facts about $\mathsf G_2$ in characteristic $2$ to be, so it might be an unfair question!)
Feb 28, 2023 at 0:36 comment added Dave Benson $G_2({\mathbb F}_2)$ has $U_3({\mathbb F}_3)$ as a subgroup of index two.
Feb 27, 2023 at 22:55 comment added paul garrett Aha. "Ree groups". Keywords, forsooth! :) Thanks! :)
Feb 27, 2023 at 22:54 comment added LSpice @paulgarrett, re, idle speculation, but perhaps it has something to do with Ree groups? But I'd expect that to give problems in characteristic $3$, not $2$ ….
Feb 27, 2023 at 22:52 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
What the parentheticals are indicating ($G$, not necessarily the image of $G(K)$)
Feb 27, 2023 at 22:41 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
One more try!
Feb 27, 2023 at 22:34 comment added LSpice Oops, I originally wrote "adjoint" (despite getting it right in my comment), but @‍YCor's comment reminded me that that hardly ever works even in type $\mathsf A_1$. Fortunately, my error did not affect the type $\mathsf G_2$ that astonishes @paulgarrett. 😄
Feb 27, 2023 at 22:32 history edited LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0
Oops, simply connected, not adjoint
Feb 27, 2023 at 21:36 comment added paul garrett Wow, even including $G_2$ !?!?! :)
Feb 27, 2023 at 21:27 history answered LSpice CC BY-SA 4.0